Re-nationalisation of GMO decisions could be Trojan Horse allowing GMOs to flow into Europe, warns Green spokesperson

Green food safety spokesperson Bart Staes warns that the new "opt-out" legislation for EU member states is still not strong enough to protect those countries that choose to ban GM crop plantings and could lead to creeping contamination of non-GMO crops (item 2 below).

Item 1 below gives a good overview of the legislation.

1. EU countries granted the right to ban GMO crops
2. GMO authorisation

1. EU countries granted the right to ban GMO crops

Environment News Service, 4 Dec 2014
http://ens-newswire.com/2014/12/04/eu-countries-granted-the-right-to-ban-gmo-crops/

A political agreement on new legislation to allow EU member states to restrict, or ban, the cultivation of crops containing genetically modified organisms, GMOs, on their own territory, even if it is allowed at EU level, was reached by Parliament and Council delegations last night.

Starting next spring, member states will be able to ban GMOs stating environmental policy objectives as a justification. These objectives would relate to environmental impacts other than the risks to health and environment assessed during the scientific risk assessment.

Bans could also include groups of GMOs designated by crop or trait. GMO crops in Europe include: corn, soy, sugar beet, and rapeseed, among others.

Speaking for the Italian Presidency of the EU, Italy’s Environment Minister Gian Luca Galletti said, “With the agreement in principle reached between the Council, the Commission and the EU Parliament in Brussels we are approaching a great European goal under the Italian Presidency: the recognition of sovereignty and autonomy of the single States as regards the cultivation of GMOs.”

Galletti said the negotiators reached “a fair and balanced compromise, enhancing the realities of the single States and creating, finally, the necessary conditions to ensure the freedom of choice at national level with respect to the cultivation of GMOs”.

European institutions “have showed great responsibility and attention as regards a very delicate issues, which concerns the whole society, from farmers to consumers,” Galletti concluded.

The agreement in principle comes after years of intense debate on this issue. Producers of GMO seeds and crops claim that the technology and the foods it producers are just as safe as naturally produced crops. They claim a scientific consensus supports their position.

On the other hand, the European [Network of] Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER) said in October 2013 that “the claimed consensus on GMO safety does not exist” and “the claim that it does exist is misleading and misrepresents the currently available scientific evidence and the broad diversity of opinion among scientists on this issue”.

“The claim encourages a climate of complacency that could lead to a lack of regulatory and scientific rigour and appropriate caution, potentially endangering the health of humans, animals, and the environment,” ENSSER said in a formal statement.

Environmental risks posed by genetically modified crops include the effects of Bt insecticidal crops on non-target organisms and effects of the herbicides used in tandem with herbicide-tolerant GM crops. ENSSER warned, “As with GM food safety, no scientific consensus exists regarding the environmental risks of GM crops.”

Greenpeacers from Italy, Austria, France, Germany, and Hungary, among other countries, have been campaigning against GMO crops for years, as have other environmental and public health organizations.

MEP Frédérique Ries of Belgium has been steering the measure through Parliament. “The agreement reached last night on the directive, which goes into effect Spring 2015, will ensure more flexibility for member states who wish to restrict the cultivation of the GMOs in their country,” she said.

“It will, moreover, signpost a debate which is far from over between pro- and anti-GMO positions. As to what comes next, I place my trust in Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s formal pledge to strengthen the democratic process on GMOs in Europe and ensure that research is genuinely independent,” said Ries, who is with the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe.

The informal agreement reached last night is to be discussed in the member states’ Permanent Representatives Committee (COREPER) on December 10 and still needs to be backed by Parliament’s Environment Committee and the full House, as well as by member states. The legislation is expected to be voted in plenary in January 2015.

“This agreement was long overdue and we welcome this result, if confirmed by the Council and the House. Member states wishing to restrict or ban GMOs would now have the possibility to do so, without facing the risk of being taken to court. It is important to let the member states take a decision in full subsidiarity, and to listen to our citizens, who, in certain member states, refuse to have GMOs forced upon them,” said Environment Committee Chair MEP Giovanni La Via.

The EU’s new Health and Food Safety Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis of Lithuania welcomed the agreement. If it is confirmed, he said, “it would meet member states’ consistent calls since 2009 to have the final say on whether or not GMOs can be cultivated on their territory, in order to better take into account their national context and, above all, the views of their citizens.”

The agreed text of the new measure is in line with President Juncker’s commitment to give the democratically elected governments at least the same weight as scientific advice when it comes to important decisions concerning food and environment, said Andriukaitis.

“I fully trust that this agreement in principle will be formally endorsed in the coming weeks by the European Parliament and the Council, allowing the member states to start exercising their extended capacities to decide on GMO cultivation as from spring 2015,” he said.

2. GMO authorisation

The Greens in the European Parliament, 4 Dec 2014
http://www.greens-efa.eu/gmo-authorisation-13209.html

* Deal avoids worst but fails to provide full certainty for those wanting to say no to GMOs in Europe

An agreement on a proposed new scheme for the authorisation of genetically-modified organisms in the EU was reached last night in negotiations between the European Parliament and EU governments in Council. Commenting on the deal, Green food safety spokesperson Bart Staes said:

“This deal has avoided the worst but leaves too many gaps, which could undermine the hand of those wanting to say 'no' to GMOs. Shifting to a 're-nationalisation' of decisions on GMO cultivation must be accompanied by a totally legally watertight basis for those countries wishing to opt out, otherwise it risks being a Trojan horse. This agreement will fail to provide this certainty and, as such, risks being a slippery slope for easing EU GMO authorisations. More importantly, it fails to really change the fundamentally flawed EU approval process in itself.

"While the overall thrust goes in the wrong direction, the worst has been avoided and some of the major problematic provisions originally demanded by EU governments have been improved in the final agreement. Importantly, countries wanting to opt-out of GMO authorisations will not be forced to first ask companies not to include them in their authorisation applications but have the option to do so if they want. While the deal strengthens the basis on which member states can ban GMOs after their authorisation and allows them some flexibility to use environmental policy objectives as a justification, in addition to the criteria assessed by the European Food Safety Authority, it is not clear if this will provide true legal certainty. The agreement would fail to ensure there are meaningful mandatory measures to prevent the contamination of non-GM crops, with the myriad of issues this raises for growers wanting to remain GM-free.

"There is definitely a need to reform the EU's GMO authorisation process: we cannot persist with the current situation by which authorisations proceed in spite of flawed risk assessments and the consistent opposition of a majority of EU member states in Council and, importantly, a clear majority of EU citizens. However, the answer of this cannot be a trade-off of easier EU authorisations against easier national bans. This deal risks finally opening the door to genetically-modified organisms across Europe, in spite of citizens' clear opposition to GMOs."