GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Majority of Europeans want GM foods – including gene-edited ones – to be labelled

Details
Published: 01 April 2021
Twitter

Woman checking food labelling

86% want GM foods labelled, while 68% of those who've heard of new GM techniques such as CRISPR want labelling for foods produced with them

The Greens/EFA Group have released data that finds that the vast majority (86%) of Europeans that have heard of GM crops want food containing genetically modified plants to be labelled as GMOs.

Additionally, the study commissioned by the Group finds the majority (68%) of respondents that have heard of new genetic engineering techniques demand that food produced with new techniques, such as CRISPR, to be labelled as GMOs. An extremely low number of respondents (3%) agree with the industry’s proposal to exempt these products from GMO safety testing and labelling.

The polling organisation Ipsos conducted the representative survey on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament, between 11 February and 5 March 2021 in all 27 EU countries.

Martin Häusling, agricultural policy spokesman for the Greens/EFA Group and shadow rapporteur for the Common Agricultural Policy in the lead Committee on Agricultural Policy, said:

"If genetic engineering has been used to make a product, then it must be clearly indicated on that product. The European Commission must respect the will of consumers for transparency about GM food, including food produced with new GM methods. We demand that the same rules for authorisation and labelling apply to all types of GMOs. Consumer protection means freedom of choice and transparency about whether our food has been produced with genetic engineering, regardless of whether old or new GM methods have been applied."

Products created using new genetic engineering techniques are covered by the EU's rules for the authorisation and labelling of GMOs. But seed companies such as Bayer and BASF are demanding that food produced with CRISPR and similar GM techniques be exempted from these rules. The European Commission has announced that it will present a study on new genetic engineering techniques at the end of April and promised expanded labelling rules for food in its strategy "Farm to Fork".

 

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design