The process to change the DNA of livestock and crops is highly restricted in Europe - but Brexit means it could be allowed here
EXCERPT: The Food and Drinks Federation (FDF) has welcomed the consultation - but told Sky News if gene editing is allowed in England, it could create hurdles for farmers exporting goods to the EU.
Gene editing of British produce could cause problems for exports to the EU
Sky News, 10 Jan 2021
* The process to change the DNA of livestock and crops is highly restricted in Europe - but Brexit means it could be allowed here.
The body representing food and drink manufacturing in the UK warns there could be "barriers" to exporting English farmed foods if gene editing is allowed.
The government has launched a consultation on whether to green light the process, which it says could allow farmers to grow crops that perform better and reduce impact on the environment.
The process is highly restricted in the EU, after the European Court of Justice ruled in 2018 that gene editing must come under the same strict rules as genetic modification.
The Food and Drinks Federation (FDF) has welcomed the consultation - but told Sky News if gene editing is allowed in England, it could create hurdles for farmers exporting goods to the EU.
Helen Munday, chief scientific officer of the FDF, said: "We feel positive there are some benefits [to gene editing] but we must also understand what negatives there might be and those may be how we can trade our products.
"If Europe has a different view on this that may mean there are some barriers to trading products that are produced in this way."
She added: "We know that in other countries gene editing is considered not to be categorised as a genetic modification and clearly scientists feel that is not the right term for it because this is something that could happen in nature.
"But if there is that difference in definition then it needs to be understood; what the impact of that would be."
Gene editing can change the DNA of organisms in livestock and crops.
Environment Secretary George Eustice says the process could help farmers produce crops that are more resistant to pests, disease or extreme weather and to produce healthier, more nutritious food.
The process does not introduce DNA from other species [GMW: False – it can and does – and also carries other risks], but rather speeds up the selective breeding process that farmers have carried out for hundreds of years.
Huw Jones, a professor in translational genomics for plant breeding at Aberystwyth University, told Sky News gene editing is different to genetic modification. [GMW: False – where there are some differences in the processes, there are also similarities – and gene editing is technically genetic modification.]
He said: "Gene editing is a tool. It uses so-called molecular scissors that can make targeted changes.
"Genetic modification is the movement of whole functioning genes from one organism into another.
"Whereas gene editing is making very targeted changes in the existing DNA of an organism. It's not adding any new DNA."
Critics say gene editing is a sticking plaster - and instead money should be focused on better farming techniques.
Essex farmer George Young is against the idea.
He grows wheat, beans and barley at his 1,200 acre farm and told Sky News gene editing simply isn't necessary.
"If you look at British farming over the last 50 to 60 years, there are many things we've done, thinking they were the right things to be doing," he said.
"We're utilising a technology we don't fully understand and we don't need."
In the same county, farmer and National Farmers' Union vice president Tom Bradshaw wants to see gene editing introduced.
"It should speed up natural selection, it's just supplementing the natural process in the lab," he said.
"It's much more targeted so it should speed up the development of these varieties, bringing in more disease resistance, which should lower the amount of artificial inputs we have to use. But also in livestock it could make them more disease tolerant."
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs says the 10-week consultation will focus on stopping certain gene editing organisms from being regulated in the same way as genetic modification, an approach already used in countries such as the US, Japan, Australia and Argentina.