GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Japanese govt to forgo mandatory labelling for genome-edited products

Details
Published: 24 September 2019
Twitter

Govt's consumer panel will discuss "voluntary" labelling

This year Japan looks set to join Australia in de-regulating gene-edited products. The news report below says the government will forgo requiring such products to carry a GM label, based on the excuse that, "it is difficult to identify a breach of such requirements by proving the difference with non-edited foodstuffs."

Note that this is a claim of the pro-GMO lobby that is not supported by evidence. If developer companies are required to provide the DNA sequencing information for their products, then they will be identifiable.

The result of this decision, if it is implemented, will be an increased food safety risk for consumers.
---

Japanese gov't to forgo mandatory labeling for genome-edited products

The Mainichi, June 21, 2019
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20190621/p2a/00m/0na/009000c

The government is expected to forgo requiring the labeling of genome-edited products on the grounds that it is difficult to identify a breach of such requirements by proving the difference with non-edited foodstuffs.

The move comes as concerns have been raised among the public about the safety of eating agricultural and animal products developed with genome editing technology.

At a subcommittee meeting of the Cabinet Office's Consumer Committee on June 20, an official with the Consumer Affairs Agency stated, "It is impossible to scientifically verify the difference between (genome-edited products) and conventional agricultural products, so it is difficult to identify violations of obligations." The agency then sought opinions about the issue from panel members.

Meanwhile, panel members will discuss voluntary labeling of genome-edited products and aim to announce its decision by the end of August.

During the meeting, a Consumer Affairs Agency representative stated, "In order to obligate the labeling of genome-edited food products, it is necessary to identify products violating the rule and slap offenders with penalties. However, it is difficult to do so at the moment."

In response, a panel member stated, "It is necessary to adopt a scheme to provide information to consumers, even on a voluntary basis."

A number of attendees called for the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare to thoroughly ensure developers report genome-edited products. A ministry official said, "We will establish a system to provide preliminary consultations and notify businesses of their need to file reports." The official went on to say, "Publicizing the names of businesses that failed to file reports would work as social sanctions to some extent."

A council of the health ministry earlier worked out a policy to conduct safety screenings on products into which foreign genes were inserted, while seeking only the filing of reports for products whose inherent genes have been modified. Currently, genetically modified food products are subject to safety reviews.

It will ask businesses to file reports after confirming allergic and other effects of genome-edited products on people's health, as well as changes in the components of products.

(Japanese original by Reiko Oka and Ryosuke Abe, Lifestyle and Medical News Department)

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design