GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Latest News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Links
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • Archive
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
    • Daily Digest
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Links
  • Donations

LATEST NEWS

  • Buy organic food to help curb global insect collapse, say scientists

  • New study questions practice of desiccation with glyphosate herbicide

  • New meta-study reinforces evidence that glyphosate herbicide is probable human carcinogen

  • Monsanto Roundup attacks healthy gut bacteria, lawsuit says

  • West Australian GM compensation report is toothless

GMO INFO

10 Questions About GM Foods
Do GMOs increase yields and reduce pesticide use, and are they needed to feed the world? Find out in the 16-page document, 10 Questions About GM Foods.

LATEST VIDEOS

  • Summary of GMO studies by 25-year expert researcher
  • Why are we being fed by a poison expert?
  • Glyphosate - Harmless tool or sneaky poison (part 2)

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

EU Parliament report reveals shortfalls of current pesticide authorization system

Details
Published: 06 December 2018
Twitter

PEST Committee votes in favour of its draft report demanding reform

Members of the European Parliament highlighted today the need to improve the European Pesticide Authorisation system. The effectiveness of Regulation (EC) 1107/2009 to protect human, animal, and environmental health from pesticides requires changes in the whole pesticide approval procedure – from the industry’s application to get a pesticide active substance authorised, to the sale and use of the product containing the substance in EU Member States.  

Today, the Special Committee of the European Parliament set up to investigate the European Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides (PEST Committee)[1] voted in favour of its draft report pointing out the shortfalls of the procedure and presenting recommendations.

Following eight months of discussions and parliamentary hearings, PAN Europe welcomed the report, which clearly reveals that the reform of the pesticide risk assessment procedure in Europe is urgent.
 
The report, voted through by a great majority of members of the PEST Committee (23 out of the 29), addresses major shortfalls in the pesticide authorisation system, such as the involvement of the pesticide industry in the toxicity assessment of a pesticide substance or product, the misuse of the academic scientific literature, the lack of sensitive testing for neurological and other serious diseases, the lack of post-market monitoring data to assess the real impact of pesticides, the data gaps in the dossiers and the abuse of the derogations.
 
"After almost a year of investigations the PEST Committee has succeeded to deliver a report and highlight the main shortfalls of our pesticide authorisation system, which allows the use of tons of harmful chemicals on our fields, even when scientific evidence from public research shows they are not safe,” said Dr Angeliki Lysimachou, Science Policy Officer at PAN Europe.
 
“The studies reporting diseases in humans, farm animals, the environment and its ecosystems due to pesticide exposure are just too many to ignore,” added Dr Lysimachou. She continued, “Today the PEST Committee confirmed with its report that our current authorisation system needs a thorough reform to reach the objectives of EU law. Being supported by a great majority of Members of the PEST Committee paves the way to implement the necessary changes in our system."  
 
The report aims to address the concerns expressed from the European Citizens. In 2017, the European Citizens Initiative of more than 1 million citizens called the European Commission to ban glyphosate, reform the current authorisation system and set clear targets for a pesticide free future.

Recently, the European coalition Citizens for Science in Pesticide Regulation, composed of more than 120 European NGOs and institutions, including GMWatch, sent an open letter to EU regulators in Member States to call for a reform the authorisation procedure of pesticides in EU and increase the level of protection. The main message of the coalition is, “The current model of pesticide risk assessment is not working and must be reformed if people and the environment are to be protected from the harm caused by these chemicals."

Note

1. The Committee was set up as a response to the concerns raised by the European Citizens’ Initiative to ban glyphosate, the Monsanto Papers (internal Monsanto documents disclosed in cancer litigation in the USA revealing how industry subverts science) and the discrepancy of the hazard classification assessment between the European institutions and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).  
 

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2019 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design