GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Block Bayer-Monsanto merger, says major new legal study

Details
Published: 16 October 2017
Twitter

Authors say merger would reduce competition and raise prices and farmer dependency

The proposed merger between Bayer and Monsanto should be blocked under EU competition law, according to a major new study from University College London. [1]

The authors of the report claim that the European Commission should be obliged to block the merger - which is currently under an in-depth investigation from the European Commission - even on a narrow reading of EU competition law. [2]

The analysis concludes that the "Baysanto" merger should be blocked as it:

- reduces competition: It concentrates even further an already tightly-packed agriculture sector. Just three mega-companies (ChemChina-Syngenta, DuPont-Dow and Bayer-Monsanto) would own and sell about 64% of the world's pesticides, and 60% of the world's patented seeds.

- raises prices and farmer dependency: One-stop inclusive packages of all services needed for agriculture (seeds, pesticides, and also "digital farming" products) would lock farmers into the company's value chain, making them technologically dependent and facing price hikes in seeds and pesticides.

- Asset selling won't solve the crisis: Even if the Commission forces the companies to sell off some products the market is already so concentrated that divesting particular products will not address the merger's negative effects on future competition in the seeds markets.

- stifles alternative businesses: The three mega-corporations controlling the global food value chain would "entrench the market power of the dominant players for the decades to come", thereby freezing more sustainable forms of agriculture.

The academics also call on the European Commission to broaden its investigation of the merger to take into account the full social and environmental costs, as they are likely to "lead to important risks for food security and safety, biodiversity... [and risks for] affordable food prices, high quality of food, variety and innovation".

Adrian Bebb, food and farming campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe said: "EU competition chief Margrethe Vestager has more than enough arguments to block the unholy alliance of Bayer and Monsanto, and send a strong signal that the EU is prepared to stand up to these mega-corporations in order to protect farmers, citizens and our environment.

"The consolidation taking place between these agriculture giants would have major impacts on the future of our countryside, rural livelihoods and our environment. It is vital that the European Commission widens its investigation to ensure that we retain the possibility to move agriculture onto a sustainable and resilient footing to help counter climate change and halt biodiversity loss."

Earlier this year over 200 civil society organisations called on European Competition Commissioner Vestager to stop the current wave of mergers in the agri-business sector.[3] Over 650,000 citizens have also signed petitions calling for the Commission to act.[4]

References

[1] https://www.wemove.eu/sites/wemove.eu/files/baysanto_report_summary-en.pdf

The research was prepared by Professors Ioannis Lianos and Dmitry Katalevsky from University College London's Faculty of Laws, and was supported by wemove.eu, SumOfUs, Friends of the Earth Europe, Corporate Europe Observatory and Food and Water Europe.

[2] http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-2762_en.htm

[3] https://www.foeeurope.org/bayer-monsanto-marriage-hell-300316

[4] https://act.wemove.eu/campaigns/stop-monster-merger-baysanto
https://actions.sumofus.org/a/stop-the-bayer-monsanto-mega-merger

Source: WeMove Europe via
http://www.presseportal.de/pm/126323/3761698

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design