GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

EPA tosses aside safety data to claim Dow pesticide for GMOs won't harm people

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 03 December 2015
Twitter

New exposé finds that the US EPA discounted safety data for 2,4-D, a pesticide linked to cancer and other health problems, smoothing the path for Dow’s new GM crops

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) changed normal safety rules in order to claim it is safe to allow 41 times more of the herbicide 2,4-D into the American diet than before, an important new exposé in the Chicago Tribune shows.

To reach that conclusion, EPA scientists changed their analysis of a pivotal rat feeding study, tossing aside signs of kidney problems that Dow’s own researchers said were due to 2,4-D.

This was a victory for Dow because the EPA’s re-think made it easier for the agency to approve the new uses of 2,4-D that the company needed in order to market its new GM crops, which are engineered to tolerate a mixture of glyphosate and 2,4-D herbicides marketed as Enlist Duo. The agency could now tell consumers these new uses wouldn't be harmful.

2,4-D has been linked in studies to cancer and other health problems.

The Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit that is suing the EPA for approving Enlist Duo, concluded that agency officials had ”contradicted standard scientific practice" in choosing as their no-adverse-effect level – a crucial level used to set safety limits – a dose at which rats actually suffered multiple toxic effects. These included kidney lesions as well as thyroid and reproductive organ changes.

If 2,4-D-tolerant GM crops are adopted, US children could consume levels of 2,4-D that the WHO, Russia, Australia, Korea, Canada Brazil and China consider unsafe.

Pediatrician Dr Philip Landrigan is so alarmed by the potential spike in children's exposure to 2,4-D that for the last year he has urged the EPA to reject the “notoriously toxic herbicide”.


Source: Chicago Tribune (register to read the article): http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/watchdog/ct-gmo-crops-pesticide-resistance-met-20151203-story.html

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2022 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design