GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Overhaul of GMO rules to be long, hard slog, USDA says

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 19 November 2015
Twitter

It will be 2018 at the earliest before the Department of Agriculture finishes an overhaul of its regulations on GMOs

EXCERPT: Several industry members expressed anxiety at the long period of uncertainty that this time line will entail.
—

Overhaul of GMO rules to be long, hard slog, USDA says

By David Schultz
Bloomberg BNA, 18 Nov 2015
http://www.bna.com/overhaul-gmo-rules-n57982063724/

Though it began its process in February of this year, it will be 2018 at the earliest before the Department of Agriculture finishes an overhaul of its regulations on genetically modified organisms, according to the department's top biotechnology regulator.

Michael J. Firko, head of the USDA Biotechnology Regulatory Services (BRS), said three years from now is the best-case scenario for completion of this initiative on GM crops.

The protracted timeline is a function of the upcoming change in presidential administrations combined with the inherent complexity of federal rulemaking in today's political climate, Firko told a room of biotech industry representatives Nov. 18 at an annual USDA conference.

Several industry members expressed anxiety at the long period of uncertainty that this time line will entail.

Daphne Preuss, chief executive officer of the startup biotech company Chromatin, said it will be impossible for her company to attract investment if she won't be able to tell potential investors how — or even whether — her products will be regulated by the USDA until near the end of this decade.

“I shut down a project when the USDA announced these regulatory changes,” she told Bloomberg BNA.

Ultimately, the USDA's new regulatory regime may end up being more favorable to the biotech industry than the current one.

New "Regulatory Trigger" Planned

Firko said one of the goals of this initiative is to create a new “regulatory trigger” for genetically modified crops. Currently, if a bioengineer uses a known plant pest to develop a new crop, that triggers regulatory oversight from Firko's team.

This trigger was developed in the 1980s at the dawn of agricultural biotechnology. Advances in science since then have made it clear, Firko said, that his team is now scrutinizing crops that pose no risks simply because a plant pest was involved in their inception (168 DEN B-1, 8/31/15).

“We need to be not worrying so much about things we're pretty sure don't pose a risk and capturing the very small amount of things that we think do pose a risk but are not captured by the regulations,” he said.

This could mean that companies would be spared much of USDA's costly and time-consuming regulatory gantlet for GM crops that are created with already existing technology.

“We spend a lot of time reviewing the same things over and over — very familiar traits and very familiar crops,” John Turner, the head of BRS's risk analysis program, said. “Is there a way to leverage this work?”

Time Pressure

But the USDA is a long way from finalizing — or even from formally proposing — what this new regulatory trigger would look like.

Firko said that next month his agency will begin a programmatic environmental impact study to look at the potential effects of several different options for the regulatory overhaul.

Then, in late summer, Firko said USDA expects to formally publish a proposed rulemaking that would lay out exactly how the department would like to change its regulations.

Firko said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack told him that this step had to take place no later than August to prevent this initiative from becoming an issue in the ensuing presidential election.

After the proposed rulemaking, a lengthy comment period will follow, and, by the time this concludes, a new president will be in office or will be close to taking office. With most new presidents typically taking six months to a year to finish prioritizing their agenda, it's likely that the biotech overhaul initiative will be put on ice for most if not all of 2017, Firko said.

Pressing Issues

Until this new regulatory regime is in place, Firko's division has several pressing GMO issues it needs to address.

Chief among them is responding to two recent incidents in which unapproved GM wheat was found growing in fields in Oregon and Montana. In response to these incidents, Firko said his office is imposing tighter restrictions on field trials of GM wheat and is beginning to hire dozens more staff members who will be responsible for compliance and oversight (187 DEN A-14, 9/28/15).

Firko also shared new details of the ramifications these two incidents had.

He said that, after the discovery of unauthorized GM wheat in Montana, Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) requested a Government Accountability Office review of his office's GMO approval process. This GAO review is nearing completion, Firko said.

U.S., Japanese Negotiations

After the incident in Oregon, Firko said he spent several days in a room with Japanese agriculture officials pleading with them not to impose a ban on all imports of wheat from the U.S.

The new restrictions on field trials of GM wheat are, in part, a way to reassure foreign trading partners that the U.S. can prevent GMO contamination of wheat and other crops.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2022 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design