GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2023 articles
  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

US growers move towards sorghum due to its non-GMO appeal

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 19 December 2014
Twitter

China’s voracious appetite for the grain stems from the country’s rejection of certain varieties of GM corn

As GMWatch has long predicted, the GMO industry has effectively "junked" the US corn crop by genetically modifying it. Herbicide-resistant superweeds choking up the fields and market rejection of GMOs are pushing farmers towards an alternative – sorghum (also known as milo), a grain crop that isn't GM.

As the Nebraska Grain Sorghum Board states, the non-GMO label is part of the appeal and farmers oppose the idea of genetically modifying it.

This is a cautionary tale for all those who are touting GM wheat. It's imperative that the problems now afflicting US corn don't spread to other valuable crops.

Milo in the limelight

NICHOLAS BERGIN
Lincoln Journal Star, 15 Dec 2014
http://journalstar.com/business/milo-in-the-limelight/article_4b62b9fb-ae4e-5fef-ba02-385c8d6d0714.html

Don Bloss’ phone has been ringing more than usual lately.

He has been getting calls from grain merchandisers and younger farmers, and they all want to talk about the same thing - sorghum.

Merchandisers want to buy it, and farmers want to know how he goes about growing it.

The ancient grain, also known as milo, is enjoying some time in the limelight thanks to strong demand from China and low corn prices.

This season, sorghum prices are set to beat out corn for the first time in eight years. The U.S. Department of Agriculture recently forecast the average sorghum price for 2014-15 neck-in-neck with corn at $3.20 to $3.80 a bushel.

Over the past decade, sorghum prices have averaged 6.4 percent lower than corn. The last time milo surged past corn was in 2006, according to the USDA.

China’s voracious appetite for the grain, which it uses mainly as livestock feed, stems from the country’s rejection of certain varieties of genetically modified corn, plus a lack of tariff rate quotas. There is no commercially available GMO sorghum.

Sorghum is naturally gluten-free and an important ingredient in many gluten-free foods. And it can be popped, like popcorn.

Fields of the grain used to be a common sight across Nebraska, much of it grown on marginal ground. But those acres began shrinking in the 1990s as Congress beefed up the nation’s conservation reserve programs, which pay farmers to remove environmentally sensitive land from production.

In 1984, Nebraska farmers planted 2.1 million acres of sorghum. In 1999, they planted 550,000 acres, and this year, 150,000 acres, according to the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service.

Bloss and his two sons farm about 2,000 acres of dry land near Pawnee City, of which about 300 acres are planted with sorghum. He is getting 75 cents to $1 more per bushel for the milo than the corn he grows. Both crops yielded an average of 130 bushels an acre for him this year.

Some farmers have scoffed at milo, calling it a poor-man's crop, but Bloss likes it.

“I’ve always planted sorghum, ever since I was in high school (in the 1960s),” he said. “It has always produced me a crop, even in the very driest years.”

Milo takes less water to grow than corn, input costs are less and it is heartier during dry years. Plus, wildlife like pheasant and quail like it better than corn to eat and for cover.

And sorghum's biomass can be used to make ethanol.

The University of Nebraska Department of Agronomy & Horticulture has predicted that intensive plant breeding and research could increase the sugar content of juice in the stems of sweet sorghum over time high enough to produce 1,000 gallons of ethanol per acre.

But unlike corn, which has been genetically modified to resist pests and herbicides, sorghum cannot be grown with Roundup to take care of weeds.

Barbara Kliment, director of the Nebraska Grain Sorghum Board, said milo farmers don’t want the grain to be made Roundup-ready. The non-GMO label is part of the appeal, and using Roundup would add a risk of milo cross-pollinating with closely related weeds including shattercane.

Trenton-area farmer Mike Baker estimates corn costs him $100 or more an acre to plant, while sorghum costs $15 an acre. He works about 2,500 acres in southwest Nebraska, of which 800 are in sorghum.

Like Bloss, he's been hearing his phone ring more than usual this year.

“I’ve had lots of calls from grain merchandisers from Colorado to Omaha and everywhere in between. I had one grain broker from Cleveland, Ohio,” he said. “If people know you grow grain sorghum, they’re going to hunt you down and buy it.”

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design