GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2023 articles
  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Genome editing not as precise as it's made out

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 15 August 2014
Twitter

New techniques can have major unintended knock-on effects – genetic engineer

An article in Food Navigator, "Forget genetically modified, here's to genetically edited", reports a new study as saying that genome editing techniques are "advances" that allow "precise editing of genomes… without the need to introduce foreign genes".

Food Navigator says, "with awareness of what makes these biotechnologies new and different, genetically edited fruits might be met with greater acceptance by society at large than genetically modified organisms".

We've addressed such claims of "precision editing" of genomes previously.

Now Dr Michael Antoniou, a London-based molecular geneticist, has commented:

"As an approach to generating a novel GM plant, gene editing is of limited scope, being able to alter only one host gene at a time. As the technology currently stands, you would need to do multiple rounds of gene editing to bring about changes in more than one gene, which may be what is required. With each round of gene editing the potential damaging, off-target effects listed below will be compounded.

"Nevertheless, changing the function of a single gene in a crop can have major undesirable knock-on effects, depending on the nature of the modification. Changes in genes coding for enzymes are particularly worrying as there is a high probability that this can change their specificity, leading to their being able to perform novel biochemical reactions. Gene function and the biochemical reactions they lead to are finely balanced. If you simply disrupt ('knock-out') a gene function by gene editing you will inevitably (I would say) lead to unintended disturbances in biochemical pathways other than the one you are targeting.        

"Gene editing has an off-target component, which varies depending on the editing method used. So gene mutations elsewhere in the genome of the plant will occur, with unknown consequences.

"Also, gene editing is a tissue culture-based method as with all other GM approaches. Thus the vast number of tissue culture-induced mutations that can occur will also be present in a gene editing approach.

"If you are gene editing a vegetatively propagated crop such as bananas and apples; i.e. bred on not via seed but through cuttings, then the mutations arising from off-target gene editing and tissue culture will be present in the final commercialised product.

"From a combination of the above this is how these so-called 'precision' GM methods can still give rise to toxic and allergenic products and nutritional disturbances."

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design