GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

GM Fed pig

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2009 articles

France prepares 'GMO-free' labels

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 05 November 2009
Created: 05 November 2009
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter
France prepares voluntary 'GMO-free' labels
AgraEurope, 4 November 2009
http://www.agra-net.com
[via http://www.gmfreeireland.org]

France is set to create a set of voluntary 'GMO-free' labelling schemes to help conventional agricultural producers to distinguish their produce in the market, it emerged this week.

An opinion was submitted to the French government this week by the country's new High Council for Biotechnology, arguing for labelling standards which go beyond the EU framework and allow crop and livestock producers to cover the high costs of remaining 'GMO-free'.

The French government has pledged to draw up new laws on the basis of the High Council's recommendations.

The labelling options to distinguish produce as explicitly 'GMO-free' are suggested as a response to the difficulties in operating true 'coexistence' of GMO, conventional and organic sectors.

"All sectors having to coexist, and numerous operators finding themselves therefore having to resort to imported primary foodstuffs likely to contain GMOs, adventitious presence of transgenic DNA in foodstuffs is possible, and sometimes technically unavoidable", the opinion reads.

French moves to ramp up the labelling options come as the European Commission looks to diffuse tensions over biotech by pushing for wider GMO import approvals in order to avoid the rejection of conventional soy shipments 'contaminated' with traces of unauthorised GMOs.

0.1% threshold for 'GMO-free' plants

The body recommends a 'GMO-free' voluntary label for plant products containing less than 0.1% traces of GMOs. This is said to be the "lowest technically possible" ceiling that non-GMO producers can reasonably be asked to aspire to.

The EU currently operates an 0.9% threshold above which a product must be labelled as 'containing GMOs'.

A new 'GMO-free' label for those meeting the new threshold would allow producers to positively draw attention to their biotech-free farming techniques, suggesting that the EU threshold does not allow a sharp enough distinction to be drawn.

'Non-GMO fed' meat label?

For animal products a label along the lines of 'fed without GMOs' or 'derived from non-GMO fed animals' is advised for livestock-based products whose diet (throughout their whole life) respects the same 0.1% threshold for GMO presence.

EU rules currently offer no labelling distinction relating to the diet of livestock used for meat and dairy products.

A separate intermediary label could initially cover the 'grey area' between 0.1% and 0.9% GMO feed levels, the High Council suggests, citing major difficulties for livestock producers to source adequate levels of reliable non-GMO feed.

This option should nontheless be phased out within five years in order to encourage producers to work towards the 0.1% threshold, it is urged.

Added-value for conventional farmers

The High Council's opinion is geared towards providing 'added value' avenues for conventional producers who go to lengths to remain GMO free.

The High Council stops short of demanding a mandatory label for GMO-fed animal produce, preferring instead a voluntary option for those choosing to source -- as far as technically possible -- non-GMO feed.

Environmental NGO Friends of the Earth has meanwhile called on the EU to introduce mandatory labelling for meat and dairy products from livestock reared on a GMO-based diet.

Helen Holder, European GMO campaign coordinator at Friends of the Earth Europe, said: "The current loophole in EU labelling laws is very handy for the biotech industry, but not good for consumers who have no idea that the meat, dairy or eggs they are eating come from factory farms using genetically modified animal feed."

Biotech experts refuse coexistence study

A separate analysis of the economic costs involved in maintaining GMO-free production in the midst of 'technological pluralism' was also due from the High Council.

However, the body has stepped back from the task -- involving an analysis of the viability of contentious 'coexistence' policies -- claiming that it does not possess enough reliable data.

The High Council on Biotechnology was created last year, and is chaired by renowned French physicist Catherine Bréchignac, who was appointed president of the CNRS (National Centre for Scientific Research) by the French government in 2006.
  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design