GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Latest News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
    • Contact
    • About
    • Links
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • Archive
      • 2018 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
    • Daily Digest
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
  • Contact
  • About
  • Links
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMO INFO

10 Questions About GM Foods
Do GMOs increase yields and reduce pesticide use, and are they needed to feed the world? Find out in the 16-page document, 10 Questions About GM Foods.

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2006 articles

US food sector wary of GM wheat / Russia bans rice imports

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 05 December 2006
Created: 05 December 2006
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

1.US food sector wary of GMO wheat - Gen Mills exec
2.Ban Is Slapped on Rice Imports

GM WATCH COMMENT: The General Mills' exec quoted in this article says GM wheat might be marketable to consumers if the biotech industry could come up with nutritionally enhanced wheat. Ironically, only last week researchers at University of California at Davis reported developing a wheat variety that contains high levels of protein, iron, and zinc, and GM is not involved.
http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=7326

EXTRACT: "The food market is not ready for that. Our stock would get killed." - Ron Olson, General Mills' vice president of grain operations
---

1.US food sector wary of GMO wheat - Gen Mills exec
By Carey Gillam Reuters, December 4 2006 http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?view=CN&storyID=2006-12-04T211257Z_01_N04199015_RTRIDST_0_WHEAT-GMO.XML&rpc=66&type=qcna

KANSAS CITY, Mo., Dec 4 (Reuters) - The U.S. food industry is still not ready to embrace biotech wheat because of consumer wariness of genetic tinkering -- even though wheat acres are declining, a General Mills Inc. executive said on Monday.

"We're going to continue to lose acres," Ron Olson, General Mills' vice president of grain operations, told Reuters in an interview.

"But the food industry is going to pay whatever it takes (for wheat)," he said before giving a presentation to the National Grain and Feed country elevator conference in Kansas City.

Olson said spring wheat imports from Canada would likely continue to grow because of U.S. acreage declines.

Still, Olson said years of work by biotech companies like St. Louis-based Monsanto Co. and the Swiss agrochemicals group Syngenta to make wheat production more attractive to farmers was facing too much consumer wariness for food companies to embrace the efforts.

"The food market is not ready for that," he said. "Our stock would get killed."

Monsanto shelved its development of herbicide-tolerant wheat in 2004. Syngenta has quietly been pursuing a genetically modified, disease-resistant spring wheat, but said earlier this year that it would not proceed with its biotech wheat project without the support of major food companies.

Olson said biotech agronomic traits like Syngenta's need to come second to traits that enhance nutrition or offer some other consumer appeal in order to overcome market opposition.

Currently there are no transgenic wheat varieties planted commercially anywhere in the world. But U.S. wheat farmers have been increasingly vocal in asking for technological advancements to help them grow wheat more profitably.
---

2.Ban Is Slapped on Rice Imports
By Simon Shuster
The Moscow Times (Page 1), December 5 2006 http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2006/12/05/001.html

The Agriculture Ministry's food safety watchdog banned all rice imports Monday and said they would not resume until a tighter inspection system was established next year.

Lovers of plov and sushi have no reason to worry for at least a month. One month's supply of imported rice is in warehouses after imports inexplicably doubled in the weeks before the ban.

Greenpeace Russia, which had sought tougher inspections, suggested that the ban was an attempt to help domestic growers, which meet about half of the country's demand for rice.

The Federal Service for Veterinarian and Vegetation Sanitary Supervision insisted that the threat was real and said about 2,000 tons of tainted rice had been destroyed at the border this year.

"We discovered a huge amount of rice this year that was of unacceptable quality," agency spokesman Alexei Alexeyenko said. "We saw pests in the rice, rice with mold. We also saw a lot of pesticides being used."

Shipments found to contain a genetically modified strain called LL Rice 601, which was banned by the European Union on Sept. 5, also contributed to the restriction, he said.

By Dec. 20, the Federal Customs Service will determine all the points at which rice enters the country. Strict new inspection stations will be set up at these points, and only then will rice import licenses be issued again, Alexeyenko said.

He said the process could take several months.

Suppliers can meet domestic demand for one month without imports, said Dmitry Rylko, general director of the Institute for Agricultural Market Studies.

The one-month supply is not normally on hand, but it is available now because importers have been stockpiling rice for the past four weeks. Instead of the usual 8,000 tons per week, imports doubled to 15,000 tons per week a month before Monday's announcement of the ban.

Alexeyenko said he did not know how this happened, and Rylko said "this is probably a coincidence."

In St. Petersburg ports, about 80 tons of rice have been put under quarantine. Alexeyenko could not say to whom the seized rice belonged, but said that it had come through Europe "from many countries."

Amish Chandra, the spokesman for the Indian Embassy in Moscow, said authorities had not notified the embassy about the ban and asked a reporter to call back. Later on Monday, he said he had contacted port authorities and received "a categorical denial from Russian customs in St. Petersburg" that the seized rice was Indian. India is one of Russia's main suppliers of rice.

The Vietnamese Embassy was unaware of the ban.

An embargo on U.S. rice has been in place since Sept. 29, after Greenpeace complained that U.S. inspection standards were too lax.

Greenpeace also called for a suspension of Chinese rice imports, citing fears that they contained allergens and "as-yet undiscovered forms of disease," Greenpeace Russia spokeswoman Natalya Oliferenko said.

Greenpeace, however, has never advocated a blanket ban on rice imports. "India, Thailand and Vietnam have all established very strict measures and inspections to prevent suspect forms of rice," Oliferenko said.

Greenpeace began advocating stricter inspections of rice in September. It took less than one month for the government to respond with the ban on U.S. rice and about two months for the universal ban to be imposed. Oliferenko could not recall a time when the government had so quickly responded to any of Greenpeace's suggestions. "That is, of course, strange," she said.

Oliferenko said the ban might have been prompted less by environmental concerns and more by a desire to boost domestic agriculture.

Timur Butov, general director of Russia's biggest rice producer, Razgulay, said in an e-mailed statement that "the main thing is that Russian consumers and producers [of rice] have a lot to gain from these limitations."

He said his company's new dominance over the Russian rice market would not lead to exorbitant prices. "Up to this moment, wholesale prices were 'very low,' and they will now stabilize at a 'low' level," the statement said.

Razgulay's stock rose 2.3 percent to $3.99 on the RTS stock exchange Monday.

Russia has been accused of introducing import restrictions to gain political leverage. Georgia faced a ban on wine, its primary export, as its relations with Russia deteriorated last spring. A ban on U.S. meat was a major sticking point in negotiations to win Washington's blessing for Russia's entry into the World Trade Organization. A ban is also in place for meat from Poland, which has had rocky relations with Russia since it backed West-leaning politician Viktor Yushchenko in Ukraine's Orange Revolution in 2004.

Health risks were the pretext of all these cases, but the ban on rice is unique in being globally applied.

Russia consumes 650,000 tons of rice per year, 350,000 tons of which were imported in 2006. The main providers of rice are China, Pakistan, India, Taiwan, Spain, Uruguay, Vietnam and Thailand.

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2018 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design