GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Links
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2006 articles

Austria finds backing for GMO bans

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 21 December 2006
Created: 21 December 2006
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter

NOTE MULTIPLE LINKS AT END

EXTRACT: Austrian Environment Minister Josef Pr ll said: "This is a very strong signal by the Council [of Ministers] for the Commission to reassess its policy [on GMOs]."
---

Austria finds backing for GMO bans
EurActiv.com, 19 December 2006
http://www.gmfreeireland.org/news/index.php

Environment ministers swept away a proposal by the Commission to force Austria to lift its ban on two GMO-maize varieties - environmental groups have applauded the decision.

A ruling by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) stated that Austria's ban on genetically modified organisms (GMOs), broke international trade laws. The ruling did not specifically forbid GMO bans, but judged that Austria had not undertaken the obligatory risk assessments according to WTO law.

The UN Biosafety Protocol, ratified by all EU member states allows countries to ban GMOs if there is no certainty about their risk. But the WTO does not respect this Protocol, as the complainants in the trade dispute, namely the US, Canada and Argentina, have not ratified it.

The Commission wanted to force Austria to lift its ban on two types of genetically modified maize, MON 810 and T 25, in order to conform to WTO rules. This is the second attempt by the Commission to force member states to drop their national GMO bans since June 2005.

Issues:

The Council was largely united in voting down the Commission's proposal by qualified majority on 18 December 2006, with only the UK, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Sweden opposed.

Austrian Environment Minister Josef Pr ll said: "This is a very strong signal by the Council for the Commission to reassess its policy [on GMOs]."

But the Council argued that, due to different agricultural and regional ecological characteristics, a temporary ban of the two GMOs was justified.

Positions:

The Commission says it is now 'weighing the options' after the vote in the Council. It further states it will ìcarefully consider the legal and scientific bases that would underpin any further proposals.

Green MEP Hiltrud Breyer welcomed the Council decision. She said it was absurd of the Commission to act like this in face of problems with coexistence and unexplained health and environmental damage. She added that due to the current findings it was negligent to admit the genetically modified maize MON810 into the EU at all.

GMO campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, Helen Holder said: "This is a major defeat for the biotech industry and their friends in the Commission. Every country must have the democratic right to protect its citizens and environment. Neither the Commission nor the WTO should be allowed to force Europeans to eat genetically modified foods."

Martina Holbach, policy adviser on GMOs at Greenpeace stated: "EU environment ministers should be congratulated for defending the environment and consumer protection against US trade interests and commercial pressures." She added: "The Commission should drop plans to pursue similar action against Greece and Hungary unless it wants further humiliation."

Latest & next steps

The Commission can now either withdraw its proposal and redraft it or appeal the Council's decision at the European Court of Justice, a process that would take several years.

Links

EU official documents

Ӣ Council: Environment Council Meeting press release (18 December 2006) http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/envir/92249.pdf

Ӣ Council: Environment Council Conclusions (18 December 2006) http://www.eu2006.fi/news_and_documents/conclusions/vko51/en_GB/1166511048482/

Ӣ Council: Environment Council background note (13 December 2006) http://www.eu2006.fi/news_and_documents/council_background_notes/vko50/en_GB/1166024078800/_files/76416558777499793/default/92128.pdf

EU Actors positions

Ӣ Friends of the Earth Europe: : EU votes to defy WTO ruling on GM foods (press release 18 December 2006) http://www.foeeurope.org/press/2006/HH_18_Dec_Austia_ban_reaction.htm

Ӣ Greenpeace European Unit:: Five Reasons to support Austria's GMO bans (18 December 2006) http://www.greenpeace.eu/downloads/gmo/briefingATbans.pdf

Press articles

Ӣ Reuters: : EU upholds Austria's sovereign right to ban GMOs (18 December 2006) http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?view=CN&storyID=2006-12-18T164858Z_01_L18112440_RTRIDST_0_FOOD-EU-GMO-UPDATE-2.XML&rpc=66&type=qcna

Ӣ New York Law Journal: EU Rejects Appeal on Biotech Crops (19 December 2006)
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1166449000664

  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design