GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2023 articles
  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

More on Government Study Finds UK's First GM 'Superweed'

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 25 July 2005
Twitter

This story is very big in the UK, taking up the whole of page 3 of The Guardian, the newspaper which broke the story. It's even advertised on the paper's front page, which is otherwise taken up by coverage of the tragic shooting of a Brazilian by police in London.

What has given this news particular impact is that scientists had dismissed this problem as virtually impossible. As the press release below notes, in a review of the evidence by the European Environment Agency in 2000, it was concluded that "there appears to be general agreement that natural gene flow is not likely to occur between B. napus and S. arvensis."  (Brasica napus is oilseed rape, Sinapis arvensis is Charlock, ie the plants involved) And if it did occur, it was claimed that any resultant plants were unlikely to survive.

This news comes less than a month after the UK government tried to persuade other European countries to lift their own bans on growing GM oilseed rape. It claimed to be acting on scientific grounds but it is now known that it was holding this study at the time of the votes. The UK's Environment Minister was the only Minister to vote against all of Europe's GM bans.

EXCERPT: "The Government's trials have already shown that growing GM crops can harm wildlife. Now we're seeing the real possibility of GM superweeds being created, with serious consequences for farmers and the environment. What is disturbing is the way the Government appears to have ignored its own evidence in trying to force GM crops onto countries that have a real cause for concern. The Government must stop acting ascheerleader for GM crops, and start paying attention to its own research, and above all, to the British public."
------

Government Study Finds UK's First GM 'Superweed'
PRESS RELEASE, July 25 2005

New government research, revealed today [1], reports on the discovery of the first genetically modified (GM) superweed in the UK - the result of GM oilseed rape cross-breeding with a common weed in the farm scale trials. The revelation raises serious concerns about the impact of growing GM oilseed rape in the UK - and comes less than a month after the UK tried to persuade other European countries to lift their own bans on growing GM oilseed rape.

The government study monitored gene flow from Bayer's herbicide resistant GM oilseed rape to related wild plants during the government-sponsored farm scale evaluations (FSE) of GM crops. At one test site, the researchers found a GM version of the common weed charlock (Sinapis Arvensis) growing in the field the year after the GM trial. The plant was resistant to the weed killer used in the GM trial and was confirmed as containing the gene inserted into the GM oilseed rape. This is the first known case of such an occurrence in the UK, and overturns previous scientific assumptions that charlock was unlikely to cross-breed with GM oilseed rape [2].

Charlock is a common weed found alongside oilseed rape in the UK and mainland Europe. If GM oilseed rape was grown commercially, herbicide resistant weeds could become widespread. Farmers would then have to use more - and more damaging - weedkillers to get rid of them, with knock-on impacts on the environment. Bayer has lodged two applications for approval to grow GM oilseed rape with the European Commission. Approval would allow the GM oilseed to be grown in the UK.

Just last month the UK Environment Minister Elliot Morley voted to try and force France and Greece to lift their bans on GM oilseed rape [3]. The bans were originally put in place in 1998 because of concerns about gene escape into the environment. Elliot Morley justified the UK position saying that he had to vote on the basis of the available science [4] whilst his department was holding research confirming the risk of gene escape from GM oilseed rape.

Friends of the Earth's GM Campaigner Emily Diamand said:

"The Government's trials have already shown that growing GM crops can harm wildlife. Now we're seeing the real possibility of GM superweeds being created, with serious consequences for farmers and the environment. What is disturbing is the way the Government appears to have ignored its own evidence in trying to force GM crops onto countries that have a real cause for concern. The Government must stop acting ascheerleader for GM crops, and start paying attention to its own research, and above all, to the British public."

Notes

[1] http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/gm/research/epg-1-5-151.htm

[2] UP until now it was assumed that it would be very difficult for charlock to cross breed with oilseed rape, and even if it did, the offspring would be unlikely to survive. In a review of the evidence by the European Environment Agency in 2000, it was concluded that "there appears to be general agreement that natural gene flow is not likely to occur between B. napus and S. arvensis." (Brasica napus is oilseed rape, Sinapis arvensis is Charlock)

[3] Despite the UK position, a majority of EU Environment ministers voted to allow countries to keep their national GM bans: http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/eu_ministers_vote_to_keep_24062005.html http://www.foeeurope.org/ban_risky_gm_food/docs/national_ban_briefing_2005.pdf

[4] Environment Minister Elliot Morley is quoted on Radio 4's Farming Today programme on 24 June as saying: "We'll vote on the basis of the scientific advice that we've received."

"And they are all saying that as there has been no new evidence brought forward to defend the argument for a blanket ban, there is no reason not to support the commission."

Mr Morley acknowledged there was widespread public opposition to GM crops which could not be ignored.

"But on the other hand we cannot deviate from the scientific advice because otherwise we do leave ourselves open to pressure from commercial companies, for example, and we are not going to bow to that," he said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4618547.stm

Contact details:
Friends of the Earth
26-28 Underwood St.  LONDON  N1 7JQ
Tel: 020 7490 1555   Fax: 020 7490 0881
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Website: www.foe.co.uk

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design