GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Malign US influence on Mexico, Thailand and others

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 12 May 2005
Twitter

This week Mexico was among 5 countries which tried to terminate discussions on international GM labelling guidelines at Codex.
http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5228

The full list was: United States, Mexico, Argentina, Paraguay and the Philippines.

Nothing could better point up the malign influence of the US and its use of "free trade" agreements.
The item below shows how Mexico was originally all set to introduce mandatory GM labelling until it came under pressure from American agribiz interests via the US administration.

Mexico is vulnerable to such pressure because of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which codifies harsh neoliberal economic policies that have helped to sweep away laws and protections for Mexican workers and consumers.

If anyone is in any doubt that this is the source of US leverage, consider the way that 2 countries which already have GM labelling also spoke out this week against Codex guidelines. They were Australia and Thailand both of which have been in prolonged negotiations with the US to develop bilateral trade agreements. In both cases, it has been apparent that they are under pressure to amend or block GM-related laws and regulations.

In Thailand, for instance, the Bangkok Post reported how, "Monsanto sent a letter to the US Trade Representative calling on Washington to address current trade barriers to agricultural biotechnology with the Thai government at the Thai-US free trade agreement negotiations."

And Witoon Lianchamroon of Bio-Thai was quoted in the same article as saying that both the US administration and Monsanto had been pressing the Thai government to amend domestic laws and regulations that impeded market access to American GM products.
http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4252

Similarly, the Thai Environment Minister was led to publicly object to the US's insisting that Thailand grow GM crops as a condition of the bilateral free trade agreement.
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/service117.htm

Prior to this the head of the Thai Food and Drug Administration revealed how a visiting US trade delegation had threatened trade sanctions against Thai imports, worth about US$8.7bn a year, if Thai GM labelling went ahead. The threats to invoke Section 301 of the U.S. trade laws were made during an official visit.
http://www.just-food.com/news_detail.asp?art=37810&c=1

What happens to countries that displease the US can be seen in the case of Egypt where the administration suddenly pulled out of bilateral negotiations on a free trade deal when the country crossed the US in its GM policy. "I can relate all of these problems to Egypt's decision to withdraw its support for the US challenge on the ban of imports of genetically modified foods to the EU," said Mostafa Zaki, of the Egyptian Federation of Chambers of Commerce.

The kind of pressures experienced by countries like Egypt and Thailand are, of course, reminiscent of the bilateral agreements that the US has signed with regard to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, and with developing countries that produce generic drugs.

The latter led France's President Jacques Chirac at an Aids conference in Bangkok to accuse America of blackmailing developing countries into giving up their right to produce cheap drugs for Aids victims. Chirac said there existed a real problem of favourable trade deals being dangled before poor nations in return for those countries halting production of life-saving generic drugs.
http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4155

And the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (FTA) shows that it is not only developing countries that have suffered from this kind of pressure on the GM issue.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/tech/InnovationRepublish_1170673.htm
-------

Industry mobilizes to modify Mexico's labeling measures

(February 12, 2001 -- Cropchoice news)-- The U.S. agricultural industry is pressuring Mexico not to implement mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods.

The Mexican Senate added a provision to the country's general health code that would require such labels. The Mexican Chamber of Deputies will review and act on the measure next month.

Possibly fearing that consumers in yet another market might not buy its transgenic fare, 20 U.S. agriculture groups sent a letter to Secretary of State Colin Powell in which they asked that President Bush air their concerns when he visits Mexico in March.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2022 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design