GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

EFSA “explosive letter” was addressed to GMO Panel member

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 10 June 2016
Twitter

No evidence it was sent by an anti-GMO activist

The letter containing an explosive powder sent to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in Parma, Italy was addressed to a member of the GMO Panel who does not work for the authority, reports EU Food Policy (article titled, “EFSA bomb was addressed to GMO panel member”, available by subscription only, no direct link). Science also has a report on the incident.
 
The name of the panel member has not been revealed.
 
According to EU Food Policy’s report, EFSA is expected to increase its security measures and there is to be a major investigation in Parma. Italian security services are considering whether special terrorist forces need to be set up in the city.
 
The EU Food Policy report says no organisation has claimed responsibility, “fuelling speculation that it was the act of a lone activist”. The Science article is more circumspect and just says, “it is not clear where it originated.”
 
It’s important to bear in mind that to date no evidence has been produced that any anti-GMO activist was to blame. Anyone could have sent the letter, including someone whose agenda it is to smear and criminalise the anti-GMO movement.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design