Draft EU law that would enable any EU member state to ban the sale and use of EU-approved GMO food or feed on its territory was rejected

It’s good news for anti-GM campaigners that this bad proposal was voted down.

In the view of many campaigners and industry players alike, the EU Commission’s proposal to allow individual EU member states to ban GM food and feed imports that were approved at the EU level would not have worked.

It would have undermined the European single market and led to a patchwork of approvals and bans that would have resulted in creeping GMO contamination.

It may also have encouraged a flood of GMO approvals by the EU, using the excuse that individual member states could enact their own bans – which bans, however, would not have stood up to legal challenges.
—

Parliament rejects national GMO bans proposal

European Parliament News, 28 Oct 2015
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20151022IPR98805/html/Parliament-rejects-national-GMO-bans-proposal

A draft EU law that would enable any EU member state to restrict or prohibit the sale and use of EU-approved GMO food or feed on its territory was rejected by the European Parliament on Wednesday. Members are concerned that the law might prove unworkable or that it could lead to the reintroduction of border checks between pro- and anti-GMO countries. They call on the Commission to table a new proposal.

“Today’s vote gave a clear signal to the European Commission. This proposal could turn on its head what has been achieved with the single market and the customs union,” said rapporteur Giovanni La Via (EPP, IT), whose recommendation to reject the proposal was approved by 577 votes to 75, with 38 abstentions.

“Over the last few months, serious concerns have been expressed about the lack of any impact assessment, the proposal’s compatibility with the single market, and also whether it is actually feasible. There was no evaluation of the potential consequences or of other available options,” he added.

“I believe that this proposal could have negative consequences for agriculture in the EU, which is heavily dependent on protein supplies from GMO sources. It could also have indirect negative effects on imports. Finally, there are concerns over whether this proposal could even be implemented, because there are no border controls in the EU,” he concluded.

The proposal, which would amend existing EU legislation to enable member states to restrict or prohibit the use of EU-approved genetically modified food and feed on their territory, was tabled by the EU Commission on 22 April 2015.

The Commission suggested that this proposal should be modelled on another EU law, on GMOs intended for cultivation, which entered into force in early April 2015. This allows member states to ban the cultivation of EU-approved GMOs on their territory.

But whereas cultivation necessarily takes place on a member state’s territory, GMO trade crosses borders, which means that a national “sales and use” ban could be difficult or impossible to enforce without reintroducing border checks on imports.

Next steps

European Commissioner for Health and Food safety Vytenis Andriukaitis has said that the European Commission will not withdraw the legislative proposal, which will be discussed by EU ministers.