GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

Maine legislators move to speed up GMO labelling law

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 21 March 2015
Twitter

Lawmakers propose new law that would remove trigger clause that relies on other states to mandate labelling

While Maine wants to speed up its GM labelling law, there’s a renewed push for GMO labelling in New York State:
http://www.gmofreeny.net/home.html
—

Maine legislators move to speed up GMO labeling law

Margaret Badore
treehugger, 20 Mar 2015
http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/maine-legislators-move-speed-gmo-labeling-law.html

In 2013, Maine passed a law that would require foods containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to be labeled, but the law would only go into effect if four other nearby states also pass labeling laws. Now, some legislators in Maine want GMO labeling to kick in sooner. Today, they proposed a new law that would remove the requirement that relies on other states.

Connecticut has passed a law with a similar “trigger clause”, which requires other states to mandate labeling to go into effect. Vermont passed a labeling law without a trigger clause, which is scheduled to go into effect by July 1, 2016. Maine would need New Hampshire and Massachusetts for its current labeling law to go into effect. New York State is also considering legislation to label GMOs, which would not include a trigger.

Maine’s bill was introduced today by Democratic Rep. Michelle Dunphy, and also has support from some state Republicans, the AP reports. GMO labeling laws have failed in a number of states, including Washington, California, Oregon, and Colorado.

“We believe that Maine is ready to lead the nation and adopt this common-sense requirement to ensure that we have a choice in the types of foods we decide to feed to our children,” said Katherine Paul, associate director of the Organic Consumers Association and a Maine resident, in a press statement.

Opponents of labeling laws say they create unnecessary fear among consumers, and that state-by-state labeling requirements could increase the cost of food. The Grocery Manufacturers Association has historically opposed pro-labeling bills (the association did not respond immediately for comment).

Consumers who wish to avoid consuming genetically engineered foods can do so by buying certified organic products, which are required by law to contain no GMO ingredients.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design