1.Germany deals blow to GM crops
2.German press review: GM corn ban, environmental victory or vote winner? [GMW: Surely it's both.]

EXTRACTS FROM THE GERMAN PRESS:

"The damage that genetically modified crops can cause to the animal and plant worlds - from mutation to reduced biodiversity - is not foreseeable. If nature were a business like Monsanto, with press spokespeople and bags of money for good lawyers, then it would have won the genetic modification case long ago." - Berliner Zeitung

"A minister has no choice; one has to make a decision that is both politically acceptable and realistic... The fact that only water fleas and butterflies have so far been harmed does not refute warnings of unforeseeable consequences. Who knows how many humans will soon have to endure the same fate as those small creatures?" -- Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

"The first thoroughly Bavarian political reason [for the decision to ban GM]: The farmers in Bavaria oppose genetically modified corn, and so does the CSU.. There is a deep mistrust of genetic modification. Germans are prepared to accept every artificial flavor, every preservative or any other dubious ingredient in food - but when it's a question of genetic modification, they want nothing to do with it." - Financial Times Deutschland

"As long as there are any doubts, Germany should follow the example of other EU countries and prevent the cultivation of GM corn - or at least impose a moratorium." - Sueddeutsche Zeitung (Munich) (all extracts from item 2)

AND THE VIEW OF THE INDUSTRY:
Lobbyists for the biotechnology industry in Germany described the decision as a setback for science and for the economy. They warned that it would prompt biotechnology companies to relocate to other parts of the world. (item 1)
---
---
1.Germany deals blow to GM crops
Kate Connolly in Berlin
The Guardian, 14 April 2009
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/apr/14/germany-gm-crops

*Agriculture minister Ilse Aigner joins European mutiny over genetically modified crops by banning corn variety MON 810

Germany has thrown its weight behind a growing European mutiny over genetically modified crops by banning the planting of a widely grown pest-resistant corn variety.

Agriculture minister Ilse Aigner said there was enough evidence to support arguments that MON 810, which is the only GM crop widely grown in Europe, posed a danger.

"I have come to the conclusion that genetically-modified corn from the MON 810 strain constitutes a danger to the environment," Aigner told reporters in Berlin.

Germany's move, which has immediate effect, goes against the European Commission's decision to support the lifting of bans on planting MON 810 which have been imposed by governments in France, Austria, Hungary, Greece and Luxembourg.

In the UK, the Welsh Assembly has declared the country GM-free [Scotland and Noprthern Ireland also want to be GM-free]. Supported by Britain, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden, the Commission argued last month that moves to outlaw the corn on the grounds that it is dangerous were unjust because it has been deemed safe by scientists at the European Food Safety Authority.

MON 810 was first approved for commercial use in the EU in 1998 and has been permitted as a commercial crop in Germany since 2005. More than 70 per cent of German consumers support a ban on GM crops for food.

The US biotechnology firm Monsanto which markets the maize did not return calls but industry observers said the ban by Europe's largest country with a strong agricultural lobby, was a blow to the company.

MON 810 was developed to resist a moth larva which bores into the stem of the corn and against which there is only one approved insecticide.

Monsanto has repeatedly argued that MON 810 crops are safe and has tried to encourage their use as a cheap and plentiful food. They are widely grown in the US, Latin America and China.

But opponents insist that too little is known about GM crops and their long-term genetic impact on wildlife and the food-chain.

The German ban will now be analysed by the Commission, amid fears it could trigger trade tensions with the US. Under World Trade Organisation rules, the US administration has the right to retaliate.

Nathalie Charbonneau a spokeswoman for the Commission said it would scrutinise the German decision and "decide on the most appropriate follow-up".

Lobbyists for the biotechnology industry in Germany described the decision as a setback for science and for the economy. They warned that it would prompt biotechnology companies to relocate to other parts of the world.
---
---
2.German press review: GM corn ban, environmental victory or vote winner?
Deutsche Welle, 15 April 2009
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4179022,00.html

German Agriculture Minister Isle Aigner announced a ban on the cultivation of US biotech giant Monsanto's genetically modified corn strain MON 810 on Tuesday after considering a number of studies. Monsanto's seed was due to be planted on 3,600 hectares (9,000 acres) of German farm land this year, predominantly in the east of the country. The MON 810 strain is the only genetically modified crop approved in the European Union.

Some German media commentators say the agriculture minister's environmental concerns were well founded, but others have questioned her motives.

"As long as there are any doubts, Germany should follow the example of other EU countries and prevent the cultivation of GM corn - or at least impose a moratorium," writes the Sueddeutsche Zeitung from Munich. "But that would have to happen quickly, before new seeds are planted. The decision will always be controversial, but it would be embarrassing if the governing coalition avoided acting until after the next election."

"A minister has no choice; one has to make a decision that is both politically acceptable and realistic," says the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. "Agriculture Minister Aigner has made her decision on the GM corn issue and has banned its cultivation with immediate effect and on a continuing basis. Her reasons may be numerous. One of them is fears based on observations that Mon 810 is more damaging to the environment than its advocates suggest. The fact that only water fleas and butterflies have so far been harmed does not refute warnings of unforeseeable consequences. Who knows how many humans will soon have to endure the same fate as those small creatures?"

"Aigner has to decide now if she wants to ban MON 810 from German fields," writes the Berliner Zeitung. "The damage that genetically modified crops can cause to the animal and plant worlds - from mutation to reduced biodiversity - is not foreseeable. If nature were a business like Monsanto, with press spokespeople and bags of money for good lawyers, then it would have won the genetic modification case long ago, and it wouldn't be governments who were worried about claims for compensation, but rather seed producers. Aigner should turn herself into a lawyer for nature and ban GM corn in Germany - even if within her [Bavarian] CSU party there is more consideration of election tactics than there is ecological conviction."

"The first thoroughly Bavarian political reason [for Aigner's decision]: The farmers in Bavaria oppose genetically modified corn, and so does the CSU," comments the Financial Times Deutschland. "If Aigner had allowed the cultivation of GM corn, it probably would have cost her votes at the European parliamentary elections in June, and probably in the German federal election too. The CSU's popularity among voters is not so great that she could have allowed GM corn. The second reason is more substantial: There is a deep mistrust of genetic modification. Germans are prepared to accept every artificial flavor, every preservative or any other dubious ingredient in food - but when it's a question of genetic modification, they want nothing to do with it."

"Fear has won again - or to be more precise, the CSU's fear in the lead up to the European elections," writes Die Welt. "For years a green-conservative splinter group, the Ecological Democratic Party, has been the fear-monger in villages in Bavaria, spreading rumors and false allegations about genetic engineering. Because nobody took a stand against them, an active movement has developed, based on unsettled farmers and city eco-esoterics, who have made the CSU scared. ”¦ Queasy feelings are dictating politics."