Getting down with Obama and McCain
- Details
2.Barack Obama answers 14 top science questions facing America
NOTE: See also: Obama Camp Closely Linked With Ethanol, NYT, 23 June 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/us/politics/23ethanol.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1220529657-rq5Kdj0rDcKR+q5MQ1k2Vw
---
---
1.Getting Down With The Farm
Joshua Zumbrun
Forbes, 3 September 2008 [extracts only]
http://www.forbes.com/business/2008/09/03/rnc-farming-agriculture-biz-beltway-cx_jz_0903rnc-farm.html
Minneapolis - Farming rocks. Literally.
The Republican National Convention's biggest fiesta was a six-hour blowout where an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 invitation-only guests packed Minneapolis' historic train depot and two massive tents, boogieing to '70s rockers Styx, a soundtrack perfect for the tribes of aging suits who run American agriculture.
...Less clear is which candidate agriculture should back. Barack Obama supported the farm bill and speaks regularly of the importance of ethanol. Industry leaders agree, especially about the importance of the fuel...
But Obama has been far more reluctant to embrace free trade than has John McCain. And while McCain embraces trade, he's a long-standing critic of farm and ethanol policies.
---
---
2.Barack Obama answers 14 top science questions facing America
http://www.sciencedebate2008.com/www/index.php?id=40
7. Genetics research. The field of genetics has the potential to improve human health and nutrition, but many people are concerned about the effects of genetic modification both in humans and in agriculture. What is the right policy balance between the benefits of genetic advances and their potential risks?
The progress that has occurred in genetics over the past half century has been remarkable - from the discovery of DNA's double helix structure in 1953 to the recent deciphering of all three billion letters of the human genome. New knowledge about genes is already transforming medicine and agriculture and has the potential to change other fields, including energy and environmental sciences and information technology.
I also recognize that the power of modern genetics has raised important ethical, legal, and social issues that require careful study. For example, new developments in human genetics allow individuals to be informed about their risks of various diseases; such information can be useful for diagnosing and treating disease, but it can also be misused by employers or insurers to discriminate. For this reason, I have been a long-time supporter of the recently passed Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act. In addition, concerned about the premature introduction of genetic testing into the public domain without appropriate oversight, I introduced the Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act of 2007 aimed at ensuring the safety and accuracy of such testing.
Advances in the genetic engineering of plants have provided enormous benefits to American farmers. I believe that we can continue to modify plants safely with new genetic methods, abetted by stringent tests for environmental and health effects and by stronger regulatory oversight guided by the best available scientific advice.
Disease treatment and identification is likewise being transformed by modern genetics. Recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology has produced a number of products such as human growth hormone or insulin or other complicated proteins that are known to be involved in bone metabolism, immune response, and tissue repair. The promise of rDNA is its ability to sidestep potentially harmful intermediaries that could have a pathogenic effect. Some forms of gene therapy-replacing faulty genes with functional copies-in comparison have encountered safety issues that arise from how the functional gene is delivered. As a result, the NIH established the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, which now provides advice and guidance on human gene therapy as well as other ethical concerns or potential abuse of rDNA technology. Until we are equipped to ascertain the safety of such methods, I will continue to support the activities and recommendations of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee.