GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

GM corn evaluation not "rigorous" science

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 24 October 2007
Twitter
 

NOTE: Dr. Domisse is a former GM scientist who worked for nearly a decade at New Zealand's state-owned research institute Crop and Food and its predecessor, the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

---

(Letter) NZ Listener, Oct 27 2007

In the article (Feeding Frenzy, October 13-19) on the GM corn LY038, which has been modified to produce much higher amounts of the amino acid lysine, the New Zealand Food Safety Authority (NZFSA) has this to say: 'All foods contain hazards, usually in the form of natural toxins or micro-organisms. None of the hazards identified for LY038 are unique to that GM variety'.

Unique compared to what? To another GM variety. They've taken one scrambled set of DNA and compared it with another, scrambled in a different way.

Every scientist in this field should have been trained to compare a novel GM organism with its non-GM 'parent' or counterpart. End of story. To compare a nutritionally altered GM corn with another GM corn is simply not acceptable or 'rigorous' science.

Elvira Dommisse (Dr)
(Christchurch)

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design