GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

Only a matter of time... Dr Wuerthele on GM contamination

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 18 July 2005
Twitter

Dr Suzanne Wuerthele is a toxicologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Here she writes in a private capacity but clearly she knows what she's talking about.

The incident Dr Wuerthele is referring to involved a failure to follow containment rules with GM plants at a New Zealand research facility - see:
http://www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=5495
------

Dr Wuerthele's comments:

This lab incident in NZ is illuminating, like Starlink, Bt10, and U.S. pharmcrop contamination incidents before it. But will we ever learn?

Humans being what we are, intentional as well as accidental violations of rules are to be expected. This is why we have traffic cops, regulatory agencies, and jails. So, risk assessment must build into it the assumption that rules will not always be followed, and attempt to predict the outcome. Decision-makers have to ensure that simple rule breaches cannot create an unacceptable outcome.

This is what makes genetic engineering of food crops to make drugs and industrial chemicals so disturbing. There will be mistakes. There will be accidents. And there will be intentional violations. The US Department of Agriculture has mandated procedures which it believes will prevent contamination of the food supply, and it is so confident in them that it does not monitor to see if those procedures are working. That certainly looks like a mistake.

But even if their procedures really work, humans being what we are, it is only a matter of time before such crops are contaminated with biologically active chemicals never intended to be in the food supply.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design