US election time

"Moffett was previously a vice-president of Monsanto, the giant genetic engineering and pesticide company. In his youth Moffett worked for Ralph Nader and now as he did in 2000 he is trading on his "Nader's Raider" past to raise hefty contributions for a well-oiled attack campaign against Nader's run for the presidency." (item 1)

"His idea of ... genetically altering the human race in order to build a super race with super intelligence is appalling." (item 2)

"Corporate interests pull the Democrats 24 hours a day... You could have opposed genetically engineering foods, the petroleum industry, and the WTO but you didn't." (item 3)

1.Can Monsanto's raider vanquish Nader?
2.Candidate causes stir in congressional campaign over his support for eugenics
3.A Letter to the Black Caucus from a Black Woman Living in South Central
---

1.Can Monsanto's raider vanquish Nader?http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2001990673_nader28.html

Toby Moffett is a well-connected Washington lobbyist employed at the Livingston Group, a powerful lobby firm begun by former Republican representative Robert Livingston. One of Moffett's close colleagues at Livingston is Lauri Fitz-Pegado who worked for the front group Citizens for a Free Kuwait. Moffett was previously a vice-president of Monsanto, the giant genetic engineering and pesticide company. In his youth Moffett worked for Ralph Nader and now as he did in 2000 he is trading on his "Nader's Raider" past to raise hefty contributions for a well-oiled attack campaign against Nader's run for the presidency. According to the Seattle Times, "anti-Nader groups have been organized for months. But the efforts have taken 'a huge move' recently in fund raising, research and a detailed attack plan, Moffett said. 'This guy [Nader] is still a huge threat,' he said. 'We're just not going to make the same mistake we made in 2000.' ... A memo given to potential supporters said Moffett's group, United Progressives for Victory, will do research, community organizing, media outreach and Internet marketing aimed at weakening Nader's standing. Last night, Nader
called it a smear campaign and said, 'It's the Democrats' undemocratic attempt' to quash third-party candidates."

SOURCE: Seattle Times, Wednesday, July 28, 2004
More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2004.html#1090987202
To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1090987202
---

2.Candidate causes stir in congressional campaign over his support for eugenics
By Amber McDowell, AP [shortened]
http://www.smdailyjournal.org/article.cfm?issue=08-04-04&storyID=33404

NASHVILLE, Tenn. ”” Republican congressional candidate James L. Hart acknowledges that he is an "intellectual outlaw."
He is an unapologetic supporter of eugenics, the phony science that resulted in thousands of sterilizations in an attempt to purify the white race. He believes the country will look "like one big Detroit" if it doesn't eliminate welfare and immigration. He believes that if blacks were integrated centuries ago, the automobile never would have been invented.

He shows up at voters' homes wearing a bulletproof vest and carrying a gun, and tells them that "white children deserve the same rights as everyone else."

Despite his radical views, Hart may end up winning the Republican nomination because he is the only GOP candidate on the ballot in Thursday's primary. Rep. John Tanner has held the seat for 15 years and is considered safe in November.
"I would characterize him as a racist, an elitist," said write-in candidate Dennis Bertrand, a financial analyst and former military officer. "His idea of ... genetically altering the human race in order to build a super race with super intelligence is appalling."

Much of Hart's platform revolves around eugenics, which arose in the early 20th century as a pseudoscientific movement to solve social problems by preventing the "unfit" from having children. It inspired 33 states to pass laws that allowed the sterilization of some 65,000 people, and Nazi Germany used the U.S. examples to justify programs that sterilized and killed millions.
---

3.A Letter to the Black Caucus from a Black Woman Living in South Central
By Donna J. Warren
Friday, July 16, 2004

"We respect your right to run Mr. Nader, now withdraw." -Elijah Cummings, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus of the U.S. House of Representatives

To Representative Cummings and members of the Black Caucus,

You demanded independent candidates Ralph Nader and Peter Camejo withdraw from the presidential race in favor of NAFTA-approving, Iraq-invading, Afghanistan-bombing, Sudanese pharmaceutical plant-bombing, right-wing Israeli prime minister and convicted murderer Ariel Sharon-supporting, impeachment of George W. Bush for the forced removal of democratically elected President Jean Bertrand Aristide-refusing, and mandatory minimum sentencing-supporting John Kerry.

Kerry's contempt for human rights, international law, arms control, and the United Nations is unforgivable.

"Anyone but Bush”š" was your cry when Nader and Camejo visited your offices in late June. But let's be honest; when Bush delivered lie after lie after lie during his state of the union addresses, it was the Democrats who stood and clapped. The Democrats made the monster George Bush!

You don't challenge the Democrats and Republicans in their abdication of our communities but you challenge Nader and Camejo for fighting for our communities. During your meeting you condemned Nader for choosing Camejo who speaks Spanish fluently because you fear Malcolm X's friend will take away your brown votes!

Peter Camejo changed the minds and hearts of Californians to oppose California's horrendous 3 Strikes Law during his campaign for governor. 3 Strikes imprisons African-Americans 12 to 1 for every white person for the same non-violent crime.

What have you done for us?

Does it matter to you that your constituents are hurt by red-lining, lead-based poisoning, predatory lending, pay day loan rackets, and dirty meat? It matters to Ralph Nader.

Does it matter to you that student Nader challenged Harvard University when they published the lie that blacks are inferior to whites? It matters to me.

Does it matter to you that only Nader campaigned in Ward 8 of the District of Columbia exposing that 65,000 people live without a single supermarket yet the District of Columbia has had black mayors and a black city council for the last 35 years? It matters to your constituents.

What are you afraid of? That Nader and Camejo may "mess up your little party" because they advocate for Black Americans and you don't.

"Anyone but Bush" is your mantra. But even if Bush self-destructs, how can you support John Kerry without demanding a mandate? Corporate interests pull the Democrats 24 hours a day. Without a mandate to pull John Kerry in a progressive direction, there's no way you can demand equity.

You told Ralph Nader you wanted him out of the race so Bush can't appoint another right-winger to the Supreme Court but let's look at the record.

Kerry promises to appoint anti-abortion judges while professing to protect a woman's right to choose.

The Senate Democrats confirmed right-wing Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia 98 - 0. Not one Democratic senator including Gore, opposed Scalia.

The Democrats could have blocked right-wing [and Monsanto connected] Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas' confirmation, they were in control of the Senate, but 11 Democrats moved across the line to confirm Thomas 52-48 while Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell sat in his office twirling his thumbs.

You don't stop anything that hurts us!

You could have filibustered the tax cut for the wealthy but you didn't.

You could have demanded gas efficient car engines but instead you sanctioned the SUV and gave the auto companies an eight-year holiday without requiring better gas efficiency.

You could have opposed genetically engineering foods, the petroleum industry, and the WTO but you didn't.

You could have opposed the federal crime bill which imprisons drug addicts for the drugs our government allowed to flow into the inner cities but you didn't.

You could have opposed the "leave no child behind high stake multiple testing fraud" but instead you chose to sacrifice our children.

You could have said "no" to the Patriot Act but you didn't.

You don't represent me!

In 2000, Congressman Julian Dixon sold me out like a $2 whore when as ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, he announced the CIA was not complicit in the destruction of the inner cities by crack cocaine. I'm tired of being sold out like a $2 whore by black people living the good life as my representative in our nation's capitol.

Thomas Paine said in the 1700s, "If there must be trouble let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." Ralph Nader and Peter Camejo are voices taking on the trouble of our day so that we and future generations may have peace.

Get off your knees and demand the Democrats stop sabotaging the Nader/Camejo Campaign. Demand Ralph Nader and Peter Camejo be included in the debates. Don't go down like a punk, remember the ancestors and stand tall!

Sincerely,
Donna J. Warren

Donna J. Warren, A Constituent

Donna J. Warren is a former Green Party candidate for Lt. Governor of California. She sued the CIA and the Department of Justice in 1998 for their complicity in the destruction of South Central by crack cocaine. She may be reached at
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.