GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

Europe votes to keep GM crop bans

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 29 November 2004
Twitter

Europe votes to keep GM crop bans
Commission's position unpopular and undemocratic
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH PRESS RELEASE
For immediate release: MONDAY 29 NOVEMBER 2004

Brussels, 29 November 2004 - Europe's member states today voted against proposals to overturn the bans of genetically modified (GM) crops in five countries. The GM position of the European Commission, who tabled the vote, has been described by Friends of the Earth as "deeply unpopular and clearly undemocratic".

Results

On lifting the bans on Sygenta's Bt176 maize in German, Austria and Luxembourg
In favour: 54 votes; Against: 221 votes; Abstained: 46 votes

On lifting the ban on Bayer's T25 maize in Austria
In favour: 54 votes; Against: 221 votes; Abstained: 46 votes

On lifting the ban on Monsanto's MON810 maize in Austria
In favour: 73 votes; Against: 178 votes; Abstained: 70 votes

On lifting the ban on Bayer's oilseed rape Topas 19/2 in France and Greece
In favour: 54 votes; Against: 178 votes; Abstained: 89 votes

On lifting the ban on Bayer's oilseed rape MS1xRf1 in France
In favour: 54 votes; Against: 178 votes; Abstained: 89 votes

The votes today took place in the Regulatory Committee meeting on the deliberate release of GMOs in the environment. Each of the Commission's
proposals, calling on countries to repeal their bans within 20 days, failed to get the required "qualified majority" of 232 votes out of 321. For some of the bans the Commission narrowly escaped a qualified majority against them. The proposals will now go to a Council of Ministers meeting in the new
year.

The Commission's proposals are seen as a direct result of the trade dispute in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) started last year by the United
States, Argentina and Canada. The three countries claim that Europe's precautionary stance on GM food, including the national bans, are a barrier
to free trade and harm their farmers. The WTO has set up a 3-person panel which is currently meeting in secret to judge the case. A final verdict is
expected next year.

Adrian Bebb, GMO campaigner of Friends of the Earth Europe said:

"European countries should be congratulated for not supporting these outrageous proposals. The European Commission only survived today by a handful of votes. Their position on genetically modified foods is deeply unpopular and clearly undemocratic. This should serve as wake-up call for them to start fighting for the right of countries to ban genetically modified foods instead of caving in to the pressure of the World Trade Organisation and the Bush Administration."

A full briefing from Friends of the Earth on the national bans can be found at:
http://www.foeeurope.org/biteback/download/national_bans_briefing_Oct2004.pdf

A new report published today by Friends of the Earth heavily criticises the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for its constant position in favour of the biotechnology industry. The advice from EFSA is used by the European Commission to justify the approval of new GM foods and also the lifting of the national bans. A press release and the report can be found at:
www.foeeurope.org/press/2004/AB_29_Nov_EFSA.htm

ENDS

CONTACT
Adrian Bebb, Friends of the Earth Europe +49 1609 490 1163
Geert Ritsema, Friends of the Earth Europe +31 62 90 05 908

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design