GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

South Africa told its delegates to oppose IUCN on GMOs

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 29 November 2004
Twitter

Alarmed anti-GMO groups said yesterday the government's stance indicated the extent to which it "kowtowed" to multinational biotechnology corporations while ignoring the negative impact of GMOs.
------

SA told its delegates to oppose IUCN on GMOs
Activists outraged
Cape Times, November 29, 2004
By Melanie Goslinghttp://www.capetimes.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=271&fArticleId=2326303

South Africa's government gave "strict instructions" to its delegates not to support the call made by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) for the halting of further releases of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Alarmed anti-GMO groups said yesterday the government's stance indicated the extent to which it "kowtowed" to multinational biotechnology corporations while ignoring the negative impact of GMOs.

Explaining why South Africa had voted against the GMO moratorium, Chippy Olver, director-general of the Department of Environment Affairs and Tourism, said: "The government could not support the call because it was not properly phrased or thought through. We want the IUCN to focus on building up a scientific base. Making rash calls like this undermines the IUCN's credibility."

The IUCN, one of the world's biggest conservation organisations, resolved at its congress in Bangkok last week that there should be no further releases of GMOs until it had been proved they were safe for humans and the environment. The resolution was supported by 84 votes by world governments and opposed by 48. Each member state had three votes.

Biowatch SA said the government's opposition to the IUCN resolution reflected its reluctance to adopt a precautionary approach to the "highly risky and untested technology".

"GMOs have potentially devastating consequences for the environment, food security, human health and the rural poor," it said. "It is extremely disturbing that our government is apparently blind to these negative impacts and the need to put in place adequate measures to safeguard people and the environment."

Mariam Mayet of the African Centre for Biosafety said: "The government has bought into a lie. It must be accountable to the people and tell us exactly what it is up to. It appears it is assisting the agenda of the biotechnology corporates."

Genetically modified maize, soya and cotton are being grown commercially in South Africa.

Wally Green of Monsanto said GMOs presented no danger to health or to the environment.

"There is a mountain of evidence to support this, from the World Health Organisation, the medical associations of the US and Britain and six academies of science. GMOs have been around for 10 years and billions of meals have been eaten with no evidence of negative effects.".

Jocelyn Webster, of AfricaBio, said the IUCN resolution was "shortsighted" as GMOs had been proved to be safe. - Environment Writer.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design