GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

Dawkins wrong on GE/Food for activists

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 05 February 2003
Twitter

5 February 2003

DAWKINS WRONG ON GE  /  FOOD FOR ACTIVISTS

1.DAWKINS WRONG
2.FOOD FOR ACTIVISTS

***

1. Dawkins wrong

The Times, 1 February 03
Letters to the Editor

Sir, Professor Richard Dawkins's assertion that  genes are a "software sub-routine", which can  therefore be moved with precision by genetic  engineering between totally unrelated organisms  (T2, January 28), reflects the naivete of  individuals who theorise about genetics rather  than those working with it first-hand.

Genetic engineering, either in an animal or plant  context, always has unpredictable outcomes and they  are frequently greater than the intended change. This is because it is wrong to consider genes as  independent units of information, which can be  accurately slotted into the genetic code of any  organism. Genes have evolved within a given organism  to work in combinations in the context of an immensely  complex genetic, biochemical and ecological environment.

The "Luddism" of the Prince of Wales and Peter Melchett  in objecting to GM food on this occasion is supported  by empirical scientific observation.

Michael Antoniou (Lecturer in molecular genetics)
King's College London
St. Thomas' Street, SE1 9RT
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

***

2.FOOD FOR ACTIVISTS

http://www.crosswalk.com/news/1183938.html?view=print
 
PR crisis manager Nick Nichols, who advises companies to use attack-dog strategies against pesky activists, delivered another fiery speech this weekend at the Conservative Political Action Conference, branding environmentalists as terrorists and comparing them to Hitler. "A lot of [my] clients look like food to the more extreme environmental groups," he said. "Government and industry have to start fighting these folks." Similar sentiments came from other speakers at the conference, which included a long list of corporate-friendly names such as Bob Barr, L. Brent Bozell III, Pat Buchanan, Mona Charen, Tom DeWeese, Lucianne Goldberg, David Horowitz, Alan Keyes, Steve Milloy, Grover Norquist, Oliver North, Daniel Pipes, Phyllis Schlafly, Craig Shirley and Ken Starr. U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney delivered the keynote speech, while vendors at exhibition booths sold anti-Muslim hate paraphernalia. More web links related to this story are available at:
http://www.prwatch.org/spin/February_2003.html#1044385804

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design