GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

Nature resists GE - Nature

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 16 June 2001
Twitter

Gene silencing is a plant's adaptive defence against unwelcome invasive elements

"Many of the details and ramifications have yet to be determined, but the current picture is that of a wonderfully elegant system that can generically recognize invading viruses and transposable elements (TEs) and marshal the plant's defences against them."
----

Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against viruses
June 15, 2001
Nature
411, 834 - 842
Peter M. Waterhouse, Ming-Bo Wang & Tony Lough

Abstract -- Gene silencing was perceived initially as an unpredictable and inconvenient side effect of introducing transgenes into plants. It now seems that it is the consequence of accidentally triggering the plant's adaptive defence mechanism against viruses and transposable elements. This recently discovered mechanism, although mechanistically different, has a number of parallels with the immune system of mammals.

Biology students are taught that the concept of vaccination came from Edward Jenner's discovery that milkmaids and dairymen infected with the mild cowpox virus were protected against smallpox. It is less widely appreciated that plants can also be protected from a severe virus by prior infection with a mild strain of a closely related virus. This cross protection in plants was recognized as early as the 1920s, but its mechanism has been a mystery - plants do not possess an antibody-based immune system analogous to that found in animals. This was probably the first observation of a plant's intrinsic defence mechanism against viruses which, 75 years later, is just beginning to be understood.

In the past decade, there has been considerable research into transgene-mediated virus resistance, co-suppression, virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), antisense suppression and transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) in plants. There has also been intense research into RNA interference in Drosophila and nematodes, and quelling in fungi. These seemingly disparate endeavours have produced pieces of a jigsaw puzzle which, when put together, begin to reveal the existence and characteristics of a natural defence system in plants against viruses and transposable DNA elements.

Many of the details and ramifications have yet to be determined, but the current picture is that of a wonderfully elegant system that can generically recognize invading viruses and transposable elements (TEs) and marshal the plant's defences against them. 

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design