1. Latham J. How the Great Food War will be won. Independent Science News. http://www.independentsciencenews.org/environment/how-the-great-food-war-will-be-won/. Published January 12, 2015.
2. Holt-Giménez E, Shattuck A, Altieri M, Herren H, Gliessman S. We already grow enough food for 10 billion people … and still can’t end hunger. J Sustain Agric. 2012;36(6):595-598. doi:10.1080/10440046.2012.695331
3. World Bank Institute. WBI Global Dialogue on Adaptation and Food Security: Summary of Main Issues. World Bank Institute; 2011. http://bit.ly/2pbWqW0
4. Hall KD, Guo J, Dore M, Chow CC. The progressive increase of food waste in America and its environmental impact. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(11):e7940. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007940
5. USDA. USDA Coexistence Fact Sheets: Corn. USDA; 2015. https://tinyurl.com/ybd52n28
6. Oilseed & Grain News. Soy facts. oilseedandgrain.com. Published 2017. Accessed June 1, 2020. https://www.oilseedandgrain.com/soy-facts
7. Pimentel D, Pimentel M. Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78(3):660S-663S. Accessed April 27, 2014. http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/78/3/660S
8. Gathura G. GM technology fails local potatoes. The Daily Nation (Kenya). http://bit.ly/KPQPxL. Published January 29, 2004.
9. New Scientist. Monsanto failure. 2004;181(2433). http://bit.ly/MHPG9W
10. Donald Danforth Plant Science Center. Danforth Center cassava viral resistance review update. Published online June 30, 2006. http://bit.ly/1ry2DUC
11. Patel R. Making up Makhatini. In: Stuffed and Starved. Portobello Books; 2007:153-158.
12. deGrassi A. Genetically Modified Crops and Sustainable Poverty Alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Assessment of Current Evidence. Third World Network – Africa; 2003. https://allafrica.com/download/resource/main/main/idatcs/00010161:79c889d407e1685067f8869a403d79e7.pdf
13. Hofs J-L, Fok M, Vaissayre M. Impact of Bt cotton adoption on pesticide use by smallholders: A 2-year survey in Makhatini Flats (South Africa). Crop Prot. 2006;25:984-988. http://www.grain.org/research_files/BtMakhatiniFlats.pdf
14. Jack M. GM project faces ruin. The New Age (South Africa). http://www.thenewage.co.za/21688-1008-53-GM_project_faces_ruin. Published June 28, 2011.
15. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Farmers get better yields from new drought-tolerant cassava. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Published November 3, 2008. http://www.iita.org/news-item/farmers-get-better-yields-new-drought-tolerant-cassava/
16. Foley J. Zombie GMO Myths. GlobalEcoGuy. https://globalecoguy.org/zombie-gmo-myths-a59123a403f2. Published April 17, 2018. Accessed April 18, 2018.
17. GMWatch. Non-GM successes. gmwatch.org. Published 2020. http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/articles/non-gm-successes
18. Heinemann JA, Massaro M, Coray DS, Agapito-Tenfen SZ, Wen JD. Sustainability and innovation in staple crop production in the US Midwest. Int J Agric Sustain. Published online June 14, 2013:71-88. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2013.806408#.UrnaHfYnuUc
19. Fernandez-Cornejo J, Wechsler S, Livingston M, Mitchell L. Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. US Department of Agriculture; 2014. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=45182
20. Gurian-Sherman D. Failure to Yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops. Union of Concerned Scientists; 2009. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/failure-yield-evaluating-performance-genetically-engineered-crops
21. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). Agriculture at a Crossroads: Synthesis Report of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development: A Synthesis of the Global and Sub-Global IAASTD Reports. Island Press; 2009. https://tinyurl.com/y5bxkld3
22. Lean G. Exposed: The great GM crops myth. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/exposed-the-great-gm-crops-myth-812179.html. Published April 20, 2008.
23. Altieri MA. Applying agroecology to enhance the productivity of peasant farming systems in Latin America. Environ Dev Sustain. 1999;1:197-217.
24. Bunch R. More productivity with fewer external inputs: Central American case studies of agroecological development and their broader implications. Environ Dev Sustain. 1999;1:219-233.
25. Pretty J. Can sustainable agriculture feed Africa? New evidence on progress, processes and impacts. J Environ Dev Sustain. 1999;1:253-274. doi:10.1023/A:1010039224868
26. Hine R, Pretty J, Twarog S. Organic Agriculture and Food Security in Africa. UNEP-UNCTAD Capacity-Building Task Force on Trade, Environment and Development; 2008. http://bit.ly/KBCgY0
27. Barzman M, Das L. Ecologising rice-based systems in Bangladesh. LEISA Mag. 2000;16. http://bit.ly/L2N71R
28. Zhu Y, Chen H, Fan J, et al. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature. 17;406:718-722. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v406/n6797/full/406718a0.html
29. SRI International Network and Resources Center (SRI-Rice)/Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Home page. Published 2014. http://sri.ciifad.cornell.edu/
30. Rodale Institute. Rodale Institute farming systems trial. Published online 2011. http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/fst
31. Roseboro K. Scientist: Genetic engineering is based on dramatically incomplete knowledge. The Organic & Non-GMO Report. http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/february2013/genetic-engineering-based-on-incomplete-knowledge.php. Published February 1, 2013.
32. Latham JR, Wilson AK, Steinbrecher RA. The mutational consequences of plant transformation. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006;2006:1-7. doi:10.1155/JBB/2006/25376
33. Wilson AK, Latham JR, Steinbrecher RA. Transformation-induced mutations in transgenic plants: Analysis and biosafety implications. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2006;23:209-238. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22530509
34. Jupe F, Rivkin AC, Michael TP, et al. The complex architecture and epigenomic impact of plant T-DNA insertions. PLOS Genet. 2019;15(1):e1007819. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007819
35. Mussolino C, Morbitzer R, Lutge F, Dannemann N, Lahaye T, Cathomen T. A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(21):9283-9293. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr597
36. Biswas S, Tian J, Li R, et al. Investigation of CRISPR/Cas9-induced SD1 rice mutants highlights the importance of molecular characterization in plant molecular breeding. J Genet Genomics. Published online May 21, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2020.04.004
37. Robinson C, Antoniou M. Science supports need to subject gene-edited plants to strict safety assessments. GMWatch.org. Published November 20, 2019. https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/19223
38. Shin HY, Wang C, Lee HK, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome. Nat Commun. 2017;8. doi:10.1038/ncomms15464
39. Tang X, Liu G, Zhou J, et al. A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals highly specific genome editing by both Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) nucleases in rice. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):84. doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1458-5
40. European Court of Justice. Press release: Organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMOs and are, in principle, subject to the obligations laid down by the GMO Directive. Judgment in Case C-528/16 Confédération paysanne and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’Agriculture, de l’Agroalimentaire et de la Forêt. Published online July 25, 2018. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-07/cp180111en.pdf
41. Food & Water Watch. Public Research, Private Gain: Corporate Influence over University Agricultural Research. Food & Water Watch; 2012. http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/news/public-research-private-gain-corporate-influence-over-university-agricultural-research
42. Lipton E. Food industry enlisted academics in GMO lobbying war, emails show. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/06/us/food-industry-enlisted-academics-in-gmo-lobbying-war-emails-show.html. Published September 5, 2015. Accessed January 16, 2017.
43. Robinson C. Kevin Folta received $25,000 from Monsanto. GMWatch. http://gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/16340-kevin-folta-received-25-000-from-monsanto. Published August 7, 2015. Accessed January 18, 2017.
44. Robinson C. Folta affair exposed in the New York Times. GMWatch. http://www.gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/16393. Published September 6, 2015.
45. Stone GD. Dreading CRISPR: GMOs, honest brokers, and Mertonian transgressions. Geogr Rev. 2017;107(4):584-591. doi:10.1111/gere.12260
46. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human Development Report 1999.; 1999. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/260/hdr_1999_en_nostats.pdf
47. Harris P. Monsanto sued small famers to protect seed patents, report says. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/12/monsanto-sues-farmers-seed-patents. Published February 12, 2013. Accessed May 3, 2019.
48. Tippe R, Then C. Patents on melon, broccoli and ham? ELNI Rev. 2011;2:53-57.
49. ETC Group. Who Owns Nature? Corporate Power and the Final Frontier in the Commodification of Life.; 2008. http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/publication/707/01/etc_won_report_final_color.pdf
50. Kaufman F. Foodies shouldn’t waste time worrying about food labels. They should follow the money. Slate Magazine. Published December 20, 2012. Accessed May 2, 2019. https://slate.com/human-interest/2012/12/plant-patent-law-why-overhauling-it-will-do-more-to-help-the-food-movement-than-prop-37-ever-could.html
51. Kahl L. Memorandum to Dr James Maryanski, FDA Biotechnology Coordinator, about the Federal Register Document, “Statement of Policy: Foods from Genetically Modified Plants.” US Food & Drug Administration; 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org
52. Guest GB. Memorandum to Dr James Maryanski, Biotechnology Coordinator: Regulation of Transgenic Plants – FDA Draft Federal Register Notice on Food Biotechnology. US Department of Health & Human Services; 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org
53. Matthews EJ. Memorandum to Toxicology Section of the Biotechnology Working Group: “Safety of Whole Food Plants Transformed by Technology Methods.” US Food & Drug Administration; 1991. http://www.biointegrity.org
54. Shibko SL. Memorandum to James H. Maryanski, Biotechnology Coordinator, CFSAN: Revision of Toxicology Section of the “Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from Genetically Modified Plants.” US Food & Drug Administration; 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org
55. Pribyl LJ. Comments on the March 18, 1992 Version of the Biotechnology Document. US Food & Drug Administration; 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org
56. Pribyl LJ. Comments on Biotechnology Draft Document, 2/27/92. US Food & Drug Administration; 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org
57. Mesnage R, Agapito-Tenfen SZ, Vilperte V, et al. An integrated multi-omics analysis of the NK603 Roundup-tolerant GM maize reveals metabolism disturbances caused by the transformation process. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37855. doi:10.1038/srep37855
58. Lappé M, Bailey B, Childress C, Setchell KDR. Alterations in clinically important phytoestrogens in genetically modified herbicide-tolerant soybean. J Med Food. 1999;1:241-245. http://www.mindfully.org/GE/Phytoestrogen-Alteration-GM-Soybeans1jul99.htm
59. Padgette SR, Taylor NB, Nida DL, et al. The composition of glyphosate-tolerant soybean seeds is equivalent to that of conventional soybeans [Supplementary information from Puerto Rico trials, excluded from the main publication but deposited with the American Society for Information Science, National Auxiliary Publication Service (NAPS) and in the archives of the Journal of Nutrition]. J Nutr. 1996;126(3):702-716.
60. Shewmaker C, Sheehy JA, Daley M, Colburn S, Ke DY. Seed-specific overexpression of phytoene synthase: Increase in carotenoids and other metabolic effects. Plant J. 1999;20:401-412X.
61. Jiao Z, Si XX, Li GK, Zhang ZM, Xu XP. Unintended compositional changes in transgenic rice seeds (Oryza sativa L.) studied by spectral and chromatographic analysis coupled with chemometrics methods. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:1746-1754. doi:10.1021/jf902676y
62. Zolla L, Rinalducci S, Antonioli P, Righetti PG. Proteomics as a complementary tool for identifying unintended side effects occurring in transgenic maize seeds as a result of genetic modifications. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:1850-1861. doi:10.1021/pr0705082
63. Abdo EM, Barbary OM, Shaltout OE. Chemical analysis of Bt corn “Mon-810: Ajeeb-YG®” and its counterpart non-Bt corn “Ajeeb.” IOSR J Appl Chem. 2013;4(1):55-60.
64. Millstone E, Brunner E, Mayer S. Beyond “substantial equivalence.” Nature. 1999;401:525-526. doi:10.1038/44006
65. Latham J. Personal communication (email). Published online 2018.
66. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Frequently asked questions on EFSA GMO risk assessment. Published online May 15, 2006. http://www.cibpt.org/docs/faq-efsa-gmo-risk-assessment.pdf
67. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Statement of policy: Foods derived from new plant varieties. FDA Fed Regist. 1992;57(104):22984. http://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/biotechnology/ucm096095.htm
68. Pollan M. Playing God in the garden. New York Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/25/magazine/playing-god-in-the-garden.html. Published October 25, 1998.
69. Waltz E. Under wraps – Are the crop industry’s strong-arm tactics and close-fisted attitude to sharing seeds holding back independent research and undermining public acceptance of transgenic crops? Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(10):880-882. doi:10.1038/nbt1009-880
70. Robinson C, Antoniou M, Fagan J. GMO Myths and Truths (4th Edition): A Citizen’s Guide to the Evidence on the Safety and Efficacy of Genetically Modified Crops and Foods, 4th Edition. Chelsea Green; 2018. https://www.amazon.com/GMO-Myths-Truths-Citizens-Genetically/dp/0993436722/ref=dp_ob_title_bk
71. Waltz E. Battlefield. Nature. 2009;461:27-32. doi:10.1038/461027a
72. Rowell A. Don’t Worry, It’s Safe to Eat. Earthscan Ltd; 2003.
73. Rowell A. The sinister sacking of the world’s leading GM expert – and the trail that leads to Tony Blair and the White House. Daily Mail. http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/42-2003/4305. Published July 7, 2003.
74. Robinson C. Nathanael Johnson: Grist to whose mill? gmwatch.org. Published August 21, 2013. Accessed July 23, 2020. https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2013/15012-nathanael-johnson-grist-to-whose-mill
75. GMOJudyCarman. How easy is it for researchers to access the materials for GM biosafety research?http://gmojudycarman.org/how-easy-is-it-for-researchers-to-access-the-materials-for-gm-biosafety-research/. Published September 1, 2013.
76. The editors of Scientific American. Do seed companies control GM crop research? Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-seed-companies-control-gm-crop-research. Published August 1, 2009.
77. Vecchio L, Cisterna B, Malatesta M, Martin TE, Biggiogera M. Ultrastructural analysis of testes from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Eur J Histochem. 2004;48:448-454. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15718213
78. Malatesta M, Caporaloni C, Gavaudan S, et al. Ultrastructural morphometrical and immunocytochemical analyses of hepatocyte nuclei from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Cell Struct Funct. 2002;27:173-180. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12441651
79. Malatesta M, Caporaloni C, Rossi L, et al. Ultrastructural analysis of pancreatic acinar cells from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. J Anat. 2002;201:409-415. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12448776
80. Malatesta M, Biggiogera M, Manuali E, Rocchi MBL, Baldelli B, Gazzanelli G. Fine structural analyses of pancreatic acinar cell nuclei from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Eur J Histochem. 2003;47:385-388. http://www.ejh.it/index.php/ejh/article/viewFile/851/971
81. Robin M-M. The World According to Monsanto: Pollution, Corruption, and the Control of the World’s Food Supply. The New Press; 2013.
82. Krimsky S. An illusory consensus behind GMO health assessment. Sci Technol Hum Values. Published online August 7, 2015:1-32. doi:10.1177/0162243915598381
83. Gab-Alla AA, El-Shamei ZS, Shatta AA, Moussa EA, Rayan AM. Morphological and biochemical changes in male rats fed on genetically modified corn (Ajeeb YG). J Am Sci. 2012;8(9):1117-1123. Accessed January 14, 2014. https://www.academia.edu/3138607/Morphological_and_Biochemical_Changes_in_Male_Rats_Fed_on_Genetically_Modified_Corn_Ajeeb_YG_
84. Poulsen M, Kroghsbo S, Schroder M, et al. A 90-day safety study in Wistar rats fed genetically modified rice expressing snowdrop lectin Galanthus nivalis (GNA). Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45:350-363. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2006.09.002
85. Coumoul X, Servien R, Juricek L, et al. The GMO90+ project: absence of evidence for biologically meaningful effects of genetically modified maize based-diets on Wistar rats after 6-months feeding comparative trial. Toxicol Sci. Published online 2018. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfy298
86. Schrøder M, Poulsen M, Wilcks A, et al. A 90-day safety study of genetically modified rice expressing Cry1Ab protein (Bacillus thuringiensis toxin) in Wistar rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45:339-349. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2006.09.001
87. El-Shamei ZS, Gab-Alla AA, Shatta AA, Moussa EA, Rayan AM. Histopathological changes in some organs of male rats fed on genetically modified corn (Ajeeb YG). J Am Sci. 2012;8(10):684-696. Accessed January 14, 2014. https://www.academia.edu/3405345/Histopathological_Changes_in_Some_Organs_of_Male_Rats_Fed_on_Genetically_Modified_Corn_Ajeeb_YG_
88. Finamore A, Roselli M, Britti S, et al. Intestinal and peripheral immune response to MON810 maize ingestion in weaning and old mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:11533-11539. doi:10.1021/jf802059w
89. Krzyzowska M, Wincenciak M, Winnicka A, et al. The effect of multigenerational diet containing genetically modified triticale on immune system in mice. Pol J Vet Sci. 2010;13:423-430. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21033555
90. Prescott VE, Campbell PM, Moore A, et al. Transgenic expression of bean alpha-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:9023-9030. doi:10.1021/jf050594v
91. Malatesta M, Boraldi F, Annovi G, et al. A long-term study on female mice fed on a genetically modified soybean: effects on liver ageing. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;130:967-977. http://www.springerlink.com/content/cw661u3345p6q464/
92. Séralini G-E, Clair E, Mesnage R, et al. Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Environ Sci Eur. 2014;26(14). doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0014-5
93. De Vendomois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, Séralini GE. A comparison of the effects of three GM corn varieties on mammalian health. Int J Biol Sci. 2009;5:706-726. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011136
94. Séralini GE, Mesnage R, Clair E, Gress S, de Vendômois JS, Cellier D. Genetically modified crops safety assessments: Present limits and possible improvements. Environ Sci Eur. 2011;23(Article number: 10 (2011)). doi:10.1186/2190-4715-23-10
95. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Biotechnology Consultation Note to the File BNF No 00077. Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition; 2002. http://bit.ly/ZUmiAF
96. Trabalza-Marinucci M, Brandi G, Rondini C, et al. A three-year longitudinal study on the effects of a diet containing genetically modified Bt176 maize on the health status and performance of sheep. Livest Sci. 2008;113:178-190. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2007.03.009
97. Ewen SW, Pusztai A. Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet. 1999;354(9187):1353-1354. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05860-7
98. Pusztai A, Bardocz S. GMO in animal nutrition: Potential benefits and risks. In: Mosenthin R, Zentek J, Zebrowska T, eds. Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals. Vol 4. Elsevier Limited; 2006:513-540. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877182309701043
99. Hines FA. Memorandum to Linda Kahl on the Flavr Savr Tomato (Pathology Review PR–152; FDA Number FMF–000526): Pathology Branch’s Evaluation of Rats with Stomach Lesions from Three Four-Week Oral (Gavage) Toxicity Studies (IRDC Study Nos. 677–002, 677–004, and 677–005) and an Expert Panel’s Report. US Department of Health & Human Services; 1993. http://www.biointegrity.org
100. Pusztai A. Witness Brief – Flavr Savr tomato study in Final Report (IIT Research Institute, Chicago, IL 60616 USA) cited by Dr Arpad Pusztai before the New Zealand Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. Published online 2000. http://www.gmcommission.govt.nz/
101. Pusztai A. Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food? Nutr Health. 2002;16:73-84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12102369
102. Steinberg P, van der Voet H, Goedhart PW, et al. Lack of adverse effects in subchronic and chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies on the glyphosate-resistant genetically modified maize NK603 in Wistar Han RCC rats. Arch Toxicol. Published online February 12, 2019. doi:10.1007/s00204-019-02400-1
103. Carman JA, Vlieger HR, Ver Steeg LJ, et al. A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet. J Org Syst. 2013;8:38-54. http://www.organic-systems.org/journal/81/8106.pdf
104. Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu J, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2016. US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db293.pdf
105. Sachs J. America’s health is declining – and corporations are stoking this crisis. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/27/opinions/life-expectancy-corporations-opinion-sachs/index.html. Published December 27, 2017. Accessed March 13, 2018.
106. Hilbeck A, Binimelis R, Defarge N, et al. No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environ Sci Eur. 2015;27(4). doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1
107. European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER). Statement: No Scientific Consensus on GMO Safety.; 2015. https://ensser.org/press_release/pr01-15/#more-179
108.     European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER). ENSSER Statement: New Genetic Modification Techniques and Their Products Pose Risks That Need to Be Assessed. European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER); 2019. https://ensser.org/publications/2019-publications/ensser-statement-new-genetic-modification-techniques-and-their-products-pose-risks-that-need-to-be-assessed/
109.     Food Safety and Inspection Service. Animal Disposition Reporting System (ADRS). FSIS–USDA. Published 2003. Accessed July 18, 2017. https://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPHS/adrsdata/adrsfydx.htm
110. Valikov E. GMO junk science meets junk journalism. Beachvet Blogspot. Published October 7, 2014. Accessed July 18, 2017. http://beachvetlbc.blogspot.com/2014/10/gmo-junk-science-meets-junk-journalism.html
111. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). ISAAA Brief 49-2014: Executive Summary: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA); 2014. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/49/executivesummary/default.asp
112. James C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012. ISAAA; 2012. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/44/download/isaaa-brief-44-2012.pdf
113. Benbrook CM. Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally. Environ Sci Eur. 2016;28(1):3. doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0
114. Bøhn T, Cuhra M, Traavik T, Sanden M, Fagan J, Primicerio R. Compositional differences in soybeans on the market: glyphosate accumulates in Roundup Ready GM soybeans. Food Chem. 2014;153(2014):207-215. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.054
115. Bøhn T, Cuhra M. How “extreme levels” of Roundup in food became the industry norm. Indep Sci News. Published online March 24, 2014. http://www.independentsciencenews.org/news/how-extreme-levels-of-roundup-in-food-became-the-industry-norm/
116. Testbiotech. High Levels of Residues from Spraying with Glyphosate Found in Soybeans in Argentina.; 2013. http://www.testbiotech.org/sites/default/files/TBT_Background_Glyphosate_Argentina_0.pdf
117. Fraser K. Glyphosate Resistant Weeds – Intensifying. Stratus Ag Research; 2013. http://stratusresearch.com/blog/glyphosate-resistant-weeds-intensifying/
118. Gillam C. Dow launches multi-herbicide tolerant GM soybean. Reuters. http://bit.ly/qBR9a5. Published August 22, 2011.
119. Mortensen DA, Egan JF, Maxwell BD, Ryan MR, Smith RG. Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience. 2012;62(1):75-84. http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/62/1/75.short
120. Food & Water Watch. USDA says “yes” to pesticide drift, approves dicamba-tolerant crops. Food & Water Watch. http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/pressreleases/usda-says-yes-to-pesticide-drift-approves-dicamba-tolerant-crops%E2%80%A8/. Published January 15, 2015.
121. US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Monsanto Petitions (10-188-01p and 12-185-01p) for Determinations of Nonregulated Status for Dicamba-Resistant Soybean and Cotton Varieties: Final Environmental Impact Statement. US Department of Agriculture; 2014. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/dicamba_feis.pdf
122. Rahman A, James TK, Trolove MR. Chemical control options for the dicamba resistant biotype of fathen (Chenopodium album). N Z Plant Prot. 2008;61:287-291. http://www.weedscience.org/paper/DicambaResCalbum2.pdf
123. Heap I. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds: Weeds resistant to synthetic auxins (O/4) by species and country. Published April 10, 2014. http://weedscience.org/Summary/MOA.aspx?MOAID=24
124. Martin H. Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2013. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/01-023.htm
125. Steed S. Worry over dicamba grips Arkansas farmers. Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette. http://www.nwaonline.com/news/2017/jul/02/worry-over-dicamba-grips-farmers-in-sta/. Published July 2, 2017. Accessed July 19, 2017.
126. Hettinger J. “We’ve got it everywhere”: Dicamba damaging trees across Midwest and South. Wausau Pilot Rev. Published online June 20, 2020. Accessed July 24, 2020. https://wausaupilotandreview.com/2020/06/20/weve-got-it-everywhere-dicamba-damaging-trees-across-midwest-and-south/
127. K-State Agronomy. Dicamba drift to non-Xtend soybeans. Kansas State University. Published July 7, 2017. Accessed July 19, 2017. https://webapp.agron.ksu.edu/agr_social/eu_article.throck?article_id=1447
128. Polansek T. Monsanto, BASF weed killers strain US states with damage complaints. Reuters. https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-usa-pesticides-complaints/monsanto-basf-weed-killers-strain-u-s-states-with-damage-complaints-idUKKBN1D14N0. Published November 1, 2017. Accessed March 14, 2018.
129.     Renda M. Ninth Circuit vacates EPA approval of dicamba pesticide. Courth News. Published online June 3, 2020. Accessed July 24, 2020. http://www.courthousenews.com/ninth-circuit-vacates-epa-approval-of-dicamba-pesticide/
130.     Mesnage R, Defarge N, de Vendomois JS, Séralini GE. Major pesticides are more toxic to human cells than their declared active principles. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014(2014):179691. doi:10.1155/2014/179691
131. Mesnage R, Antoniou MN. Ignoring adjuvant toxicity falsifies the safety profile of commercial pesticides. Front Public Health. 2018;5. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00361
132. Portier CJ, Armstrong BK, Baguley BC, et al. Differences in the carcinogenic evaluation of glyphosate between the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(8). doi:10.1136/jech-2015-207005
133. Portier CJ, Clausing P. Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91(9):3195-3197. doi:10.1007/s00204-017-2009-7
134. Robinson C, Portier CJ, Čavoški A, et al. Achieving a high level of protection from pesticides in Europe: Problems with the current risk assessment procedure and solutions. Eur J Risk Regul. Published online 2020:1-31. doi:10.1017/err.2020.18
135. Antoniou M, Habib MEM, Leifert C, et al. Teratogenic effects of glyphosate-based herbicides: Divergence of regulatory decisions from scientific evidence. J Env Anal Toxicol. 2012;S4:006. doi:10.4172/2161-0525.S4-006
136. Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(3):378-455. doi:10.1210/er.2011-1050
137. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, et al. Executive summary to EDC-2: The Endocrine Society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):593-602. doi:10.1210/er.2015-1093
138. Myers JP, Antoniou MN, Blumberg B, et al. Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environ Health. 2016;15(19). doi:10.1186/s12940-016-0117-0
139. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 112 (2015): Glyphosate. IARC; 2015. https://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/pdf/MonographVolume112.pdf
140. Benbrook CM. How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? Environ Sci Eur. 2019;31(2). doi:10.1186/s12302-018-0184-7
141. Kelland K. Large US farm study finds no cancer link to Monsanto weedkiller. Reuters. https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-health-cancer-glyphosate/large-u-s-farm-study-finds-no-cancer-link-to-monsanto-weedkiller-idUKKBN1D916C. Published August 3, 2017. Accessed March 13, 2018.
142. Kelland K. Cancer agency left in the dark over glyphosate evidence. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/glyphosate-cancer-data/. Published June 14, 2017. Accessed March 13, 2018.
143. De Roos AJ, Blair A, Rusiecki JA, et al. Cancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Env Health Perspect. 2005;113:49-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15626647
144. Andreotti G, Koutros S, Hofmann JN, et al. Glyphosate use and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.1093/jnci/djx233
145. Sass J. Updated Ag Health Study of glyphosate and cancer. Published November 15, 2017. Accessed March 13, 2018. https://www.nrdc.org/experts/jennifer-sass/updated-ag-health-study-glyphosate-and-cancer
146. Zhang L, Rana I, Shaffer RM, Taioli E, Sheppard L. Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis and supporting evidence. Mutat Res Mutat Res. Published online February 10, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.001
147. Levin S, Greenfield P. Monsanto ordered to pay $289m as jury rules weedkiller caused man’s cancer. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/aug/10/monsanto-trial-cancer-dewayne-johnson-ruling. Published August 11, 2018. Accessed February 11, 2019.
148. Gillam C. Appeals court upholds groundskeeper’s Roundup cancer win over Monsanto. US Right to Know. Published July 20, 2020. Accessed July 23, 2020. https://usrtk.org/tag/lee-johnson/
149. Levin S. The family that took on Monsanto: “They should’ve been with us in the chemo ward.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/apr/10/edwin-hardeman-monsanto-trial-interview. Published April 10, 2019. Accessed April 11, 2019.
150. Buck T. Monsanto risk takes root with Bayer investors. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/ba67adba-4b26-11e9-bbc9-6917dce3dc62. Published March 21, 2019. Accessed April 11, 2019.
151. Elias P. Weed killer cancer case: Jury orders Monsanto to pay $2 billion. USA Today. Published online December 10, 2019. Accessed July 23, 2020. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/05/13/weed-killer-cancer-case-jury-orders-monsanto-pay-2-billion/1194572001/
152. Mesnage R, Renney G, Séralini G-E, Ward M, Antoniou MN. Multiomics reveal non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats following chronic exposure to an ultra-low dose of Roundup herbicide. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39328. doi:10.1038/srep39328
153. Mesnage R, Arno M, Costanzo M, Malatesta M, Séralini G-E, Antoniou MN. Transcriptome profile analysis reflects rat liver and kidney damage following chronic ultra-low dose Roundup exposure. Environ Health. 2015;14(1):70. doi:10.1186/s12940-015-0056-1
154. American Liver Foundation. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. American Liver Foundation. Published 2016. Accessed July 13, 2017. https://www.liverfoundation.org/obesity-and-fatty-livers/
155. Weiß J, Rau M, Geier A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2014;111(26):447-452. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2014.0447
156. Jayasumana C, Gunatilake S, Senanayake P. Glyphosate, hard water and nephrotoxic metals: Are they the culprits behind the epidemic of chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology in Sri Lanka? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(2):2125-2147. doi:10.3390/ijerph110202125
157. Jayasumana C, Paranagama P, Agampodi S, Wijewardane C, Gunatilake S, Siribaddana S. Drinking well water and occupational exposure to herbicides is associated with chronic kidney disease, in Padavi-Sripura, Sri Lanka. Environ Health. 2015;14(1):6. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-14-6
158. Jayasumana C, Gunatilake S, Siribaddana S. Simultaneous exposure to multiple heavy metals and glyphosate may contribute to Sri Lankan agricultural nephropathy. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16(1):103. doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0109-2
159. Ehrenstein OS von, Ling C, Cui X, et al. Prenatal and infant exposure to ambient pesticides and autism spectrum disorder in children: population based case-control study. BMJ. 2019;364:l962. doi:10.1136/bmj.l962
160. Mesnage R, Teixeira M, Mandrioli D, et al. Use of shotgun metagenomics and metabolomics to evaluate the impact of glyphosate or Roundup MON 52276 on the gut microbiota and serum metabolome of Sprague-Dawley rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2021;129(1). doi:10.1289/EHP6990
161. Gillam C. How Monsanto manufactured “outrage” at IARC over cancer classification. Published September 19, 2017. Accessed March 13, 2018. https://usrtk.org/pesticides/how-monsanto-manufactured-outrage-at-iarc-over-cancer-classification/
162. Waldman P, Stecker T, Rosenblatt J. Monsanto was Its own ghostwriter for some safety reviews. Bloomberg Businessweek. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-09/monsanto-was-its-own-ghostwriter-for-some-safety-reviews. Published August 9, 2017. Accessed March 13, 2018.
163. Rosenblatt J, Mulvany L, Waldman P. EPA official accused of helping Monsanto “kill” cancer study. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-14/monsanto-accused-of-ghost-writing-papers-on-roundup-cancer-risk. Published March 14, 2017. Accessed July 24, 2017.
164. Hakim D. Monsanto emails raise issue of influencing research on Roundup weed killer. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/business/monsantos-sway-over-research-is-seen-in-disclosed-emails.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share. Published August 1, 2017. Accessed March 13, 2018.
165. Neslen A. EU declared Monsanto weedkiller safe after intervention from controversial US official. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/24/eu-declared-monsanto-weedkiller-safe-after-intervention-from-controversial-us-official. Published May 24, 2017. Accessed March 13, 2018.
166. Robinson C. Uncovered: Monsanto campaign to get Séralini study retracted. GMWatch. http://gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/17764. Published August 2, 2017.
167. Baum Hedlund Aristei Goldman. Monsanto Papers: Secret documents: page two. Published online August 1, 2017. https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/monsanto-secret-documents-page-two/
168. Farmer D. Re: Agitation against Roundup. Published online November 22, 2003. http://baumhedlundlaw.com/pdf/monsanto-documents/27-Internal-Monsanto-Email-You-Cannot-Say-That-Roundup-is-not-a-Carcinogen.pdf
169. Latham JR, Love M, Hilbeck A. The distinct properties of natural and GM cry insecticidal proteins. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2017;33(1):62-96. doi:10.1080/02648725.2017.1357295
170. Latham J. Have Monsanto and the biotech industry turned natural Bt pesticides into GMO “super toxins”? Independent Science News. https://www.independentsciencenews.org/environment/have-monsanto-and-the-biotech-industry-turned-natural-bt-pesticides-into-gmo-super-toxins/. Published October 9, 2017.
171. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature. 1999;399:214. doi:10.1038/20338
172. Jesse LCH, Obrycki JJ. Field deposition of Bt transgenic corn pollen: Lethal effects on the monarch butterfly. J Oecologia. 2000;125:241-248. http://adamoliverbrown.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/5-BT-corn-and-monarch.pdf
173. Hilbeck A, Baumgartner M, Fried PM, Bigler F. Effects of transgenic Bt corn-fed prey on immature development of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol. 1998;27(2):480-487. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B7GVS-4DS333P-10&_user=10&_coverDate=01/01/2001&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1479158748&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=0e143cb4b9989880e9b50648a48ca8d0&searchtype=a
174. Hilbeck A, McMillan JM, Meier M, Humbel A, Schlaepfer-Miller J, Trtikova M. A controversy re-visited: Is the coccinellid Adalia bipunctata adversely affected by Bt toxins? Environ Sci Eur. 2012;24(10). doi:10.1186/2190-4715-24-10
175. Hilbeck A, Meier M, Trtikova M. Underlying reasons of the controversy over adverse effects of Bt toxins on lady beetle and lacewing larvae. Environ Sci Eur. 2012;24(9). doi:10.1186/2190-4715-24-9
176. Hilbeck A, Moar WJ, Pusztai-Carey M, Filippini A, Bigler F. Prey-mediated effects of Cry1Ab toxin and protoxin and Cry2A protoxin on the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Entomol Exp Appl. 1999;91:305-316. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00497.x/abstract
177. Marvier M, McCreedy C, Regetz J, Kareiva P. A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates. Science. 2007;316:1475-1477. doi:10.1126/science.1139208
178. Lövei GL, Arpaia S. The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: A critical review of laboratory studies. Entomol Exp Appl. 2005;114:1-14. doi:10.1111/j.0013-8703.2005.00235.x
179. Castaldini M, Turrini A, Sbrana C, et al. Impact of Bt corn on rhizospheric and soil eubacterial communities and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microcosms. Appl Env Microbiol. 2005;71:6719-6729. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.11.6719-6729.2005
180. Séralini GE, Cellier D, Spiroux de Vendomois J. New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007;52:596-602. http://www.rapaluruguay.org/transgenicos/Maiz/Genetically_Maize.pdf
181. Fares NH, El-Sayed AK. Fine structural changes in the ileum of mice fed on delta-endotoxin-treated potatoes and transgenic potatoes. Nat Toxins. 1998;6(6):219-233. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10441029
182. Benbrook C. Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the US – The first sixteen years. Environ Sci Eur. 2012;24(24). doi:10.1186/2190-4715-24-24
183. Tabashnik BE, Gassmann AJ, Crowder DW, Carriere Y. Insect resistance to Bt crops: Evidence versus theory. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:199-202. doi:10.1038/nbt1382
184. Rensburg JBJ. First report of field resistance by the stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) to Bt-transgenic maize. Afr J Plant Soil. 2007;24:147-151. http://www.eko.org.ee/gmo/images/stories/research/filed_resistance_to_bt_maize.pdf
185. Huang F, Leonard BR, Wu X. Resistance of sugarcane borer to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin. Entomol Exp Appl. 2007;124:117-123. http://agribiotech.free.fr/Huang_2007%20-%20Cry1Ab%20toxin%20-%20Bt%20resistant%20management.pdf
186. Keim B. Voracious worm evolves to eat biotech corn engineered to kill it. Wired.com. Published online March 17, 2014. http://www.wired.com/2014/03/rootworm-resistance-bt-corn/
187. Gray M. Western corn rootworm resistance to Bt corn confirmed in more Illinois counties. Aces News. http://www.aces.uiuc.edu/news/stories/news5903.html. Published April 7, 2014.
188. Gillam C. GMO corn failing to protect fields from pest damage – report. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/28/usa-gmo-corn-rootworm-idUSL2N0GT1ED20130828. Published August 28, 2013.
189. Unglesbee E. Worm rebellion continues: Bollworm populations threaten Bt cotton again this year. DTN Progressive Farmer. https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/crops/article/2017/07/20/bollworm-populations-threaten-bt. Published July 20, 2017. Accessed July 21, 2017.
190. Farias JR, Andow DA, Horikoshi RJ, et al. Field-evolved resistance to Cry1F maize by Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. Crop Prot. 2014;64:150-158. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2014.06.019
191. Buradikatti K. Pink bollworm a nightmare for Bt cotton growers. The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/pink-bollworm-a-nightmare-for-bt-cotton-growers/article7950687.ece. Published December 5, 2015. Accessed July 19, 2017.
192. Kurmanath KV. Wily pink bollworm survives Monsanto’s Bollgard-II. The Hindu Business Line. http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/agri-business/wily-pink-bollworm-survives-monsantos-bollgardii/article7814810.ece. Published October 28, 2015. Accessed July 19, 2017.
193. Kasabe N. Bt cotton fails, demand for desi cotton seeds growing for kharif season. The Financial Express. http://www.financialexpress.com/market/commodities/demand-for-domestic-cotton-seeds-growing/254123/. Published May 13, 2016. Accessed July 19, 2017.
194. Gutierrez AP, Ponti L, Herren HR, Baumgärtner J, Kenmore PE. Deconstructing Indian cotton: weather, yields, and suicides. Environ Sci Eur. 2015;27(1):12. doi:10.1186/s12302-015-0043-8
195. Kranthi KR. Cotton production systems - Need for a change in India. Cotton Stat News. Published online December 16, 2014:4-7. http://www.cicr.org.in/pdf/Kranthi_art/cotton_prod_system_dec_2014.pdf
196. Boyle EA, Li YI, Pritchard JK. An expanded view of complex traits: From polygenic to omnigenic. Cell. 2017;169(7):1177-1186. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.038
197. Antoniou M. Bound to fail: The flawed scientific foundations of agricultural genetic engineering (part 2). GMWatch.org. Published November 21, 2018. Accessed February 13, 2019. https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/archive/2018/18593-bound-to-fail-the-flawed-scientific-foundations-of-agricultural-genetic-engineering-part-2