GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Gene Editing
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
      • Audio
        • Recordings of scientist Arpad Pusztai interviewed by journalist Andy Rowell
    • Contact
    • About
    • Search
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • Gene Editing
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
    • Audio
      • Recordings of scientist Arpad Pusztai interviewed by journalist Andy Rowell
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About
  • Search

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

European Parliament vote to deregulate new GMOs: Biotech lobby pushes false solutions for patent problem

Details
Published: 13 April 2026
Twitter


Survey shows 80% of citizens in five EU countries oppose patents on seeds

On 18 May the European Parliament is expected to vote on a new law that would exempt food plants obtained from new genetic engineering techniques (NGTs) from existing GMO rules. The deregulation of NGTs will undermine food safety standards and consumers' right to choose, and is also likely to lead to further concentration in the seed sector through the patenting of food crops.

A new article by Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) and GMWatch shows that industry lobby groups try to allay concerns about the impact of patented crops with shallow and misleading arguments. A new survey shows that most EU citizens oppose patents on plants and animals.

Lobby documents obtained from the European Commission show that:

• Industry lobby groups Euroseeds and CropLife Europe, representing biotech multinationals like Bayer and Syngenta, underplay the problems linked to patents and propose inadequate ‘solutions’. For instance, the voluntary licensing platforms industry has set up do not pro-vide a solution to increased dependence for small- and medium-sized breeding companies, nor to increased concentration in the seed sector.

• Farm lobby Copa-Cogeca issued a strong warning against patents, but later went silent on the issue. Other farm groups like Deutsche Bauern Verband and ECVC remain vocal about their objections to patents.

In the negotiations that were finalised last December, the Parliament’s rapporteur failed to uphold the Parliament’s position, which demanded mandatory consumer labelling and did not allow patents for NGTs that would be deregulated. The provisions on patents that are included in the current text, such as the setting up of an expert group, are insufficient to protect farmers’ and breeders’ interests.

In addition, today the coalition No Patents on Seeds! published a representative survey in five EU countries (France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and Poland). The results are clear: Around 80% of the citizens reject patents on living organisms such as plants or animals.

Nina Holland, researcher at Corporate Europe Observatory, said: “The only ones profiting from scrapping safety and labelling rules and from patents are a few big seed corporations like Bayer and Syngenta. The Members of the European Parliament have a final chance to protect the interests of consumers, farmers and small- and medium-sized breeding companies”.

Claire Robinson, co-director of GMWatch, said: “The deregulation proposal represents a dangerous grab for power over our seeds and food supply. Decades of experience show that the big agribusiness companies that dominate the patent landscape for new GMOs serve only their own interests and are eager to hound farmers and breeders with allegations of patent infringement. The Parliament must stand up for the people and for a truly sustainable system and reject the proposal in its current form.”

Further information

• The article by Corporate Europe Observatory and GMWatch
• Survey
• Corporate Europe Observatory report, "Derailing EU rules on new GMOs: CRISPR-Files expose lobbying tactics to deregulate new GMOs" 

Images: depositphotos.com (licensed purchases) 

 

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2026 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design