GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

LATEST VIDEOS

  • Herbicide-tolerant/Bt cotton chaos in Indian fields
  • Seed keepers and truth tellers: From the frontlines of GM agriculture
  • Myths and Truths of Gene-Edited Foods

KEVIN FOLTA: A rogue’s gallery

Roundup, dollars and Kevin Folta

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

The advantages of current EU GMO legislation

Details
Published: 20 October 2022
Twitter

Non-GMO industry association sees no justification for a deregulation of New GMOs

Here's an excellent and clear article from the European Non-GMO Industry Association (ENGA).
---

The advantages of current EU GMO legislation

ENGA, 18 Oct 2022
https://www.enga.org/newsdetails/the-advantages-of-current-eu-gmo-legislation

In the EU, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are strictly regulated in order to protect human and animal health and the environment. We examine why the current EU legislation works well for both the industry and the consumer.

In the EU, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are strictly regulated, by a legal framework, which - according to the EU Commission’s website - aims to protect human and animal health and the environment, by having a safety assessment “of the highest possible standards” at EU level before any product is placed on the market. It also ensures:
* harmonised procedures for risk assessment and authorisation of GMOs that are efficient, time-limited and transparent.
* clear labelling of GMOs placed on the market in order to enable consumers as well as professionals as (e.g. farmers, and food feed chain operators) to make an informed choice.
* the traceability of GMOs placed on the market.

What does the law say about New GMOs?

New GMOs, those created by what are known as “New Genomic Techniques” (NGTs), such as CRISPR, are regulated by this same legal framework. This has been clarified  by the highest European court, in  July 2018 when the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that all products stemming from new genetic engineering methods are GMOs. For New and old GMOs the same EU legislation, therefore, applies.

The European Commission’s road to deregulation

In September 2021, however, the European Commission officially started its deregulation process of New GMOs launching an inception impact assessment. The European Commission wants to exclude plants derived from targeted mutagenesis and cisgenesis from the existing EU GMO legislation. This would undermine the ECJ’s ruling, contradict the precautionary principle and eliminate risk assessments as well as traceability and labelling requirements for approximately 95% of all new GM plants currently in the development pipeline.

The status quo: puts food safety and freedom of choice first

The status quo means that old and New GMOs are subject to authorisation procedures with a food safety and environmental risk assessment before coming on the market. After market authorisation, the EU GMO legislation ensures detectability, traceability and labelling of GMOs – and thus safety, transparency and freedom of choice for breeders, farmers, food and feed producers, food retailers and consumers. Business operators keep control over their food and feed production value chains, the European food sector (producers and retailers) does not  run the risk of selling untested and invisible GMOs to unwitting consumers.

Last but not least, the current EU GMO regulation is balanced – it enables authorisation and placing on the market of GMOs and it allows those that want to, to avoid them. Throughout the entire food sector, the trend is towards more transparency; why then do the proponents of New GMOs (and it seems the European Commission) want to hide GMOs? It would be impossible to convey to a predominantly GMO-critical public that there is a backward step in transparency in a technology as controversial as genetic engineering.

Bearing in mind the advantages outlined above, ENGA sees no justification for a deregulation of New GMOs. ENGA is, therefore, calling on the European Commission to respect the ruling of the ECJ and support members states in implementing the current EU GMO legislation for new genomic techniques.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design