GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

New GMOs: EU must invest in research on risks and detection methods

Details
Published: 08 February 2022
Twitter

Plant in a test tube

EU invests millions of euros in the development of new genetic engineering, but does not commission any research on its risks – MEPs

The EU has so far not funded any EU research projects that would specifically address the risks and detection methods for new genetic engineering techniques, like gene editing. Today, 31 MEPs from five political groups in the European Parliament called on the EU Commission to change this and to fund such research projects. So far, the EU has mainly funded the development of new genetic engineering, as well as public relations work for its use in agriculture.

Martin Häusling, agricultural policy spokesperson for the Greens in the European Parliament and member of the Environment and Health Committee, initiated the letter. He said:

"It is incomprehensible why the EU invests many millions [of euros] in the development of new genetic engineering, but does not commission any research on its risks for the environment and health. Research on detection methods is also left out. This is negligent and must change immediately.

"The EU member states also allocate only 1.6 percent of their research budgets for new genetic engineering to the areas of risk assessment and detection methods. This research gap must be closed urgently.

"With new genetic engineering methods such as CRISPR/Cas, the genetic material of plants can be modified even more profoundly and quickly than is possible with conventional breeding or the methods of old genetic engineering. This gives rise to new risks, both in terms of the intended characteristics and unintended consequences of genetic manipulation. Only with appropriate research on possible risks are the facts on the table and only then can we take appropriate precautions in dealing with the new techniques.

"Research on detection methods for new genetic engineering is also lacklustre. This is despite the fact that various EU member states, including Austria, France and Italy, have explicitly spoken out in favour of such research at the EU level. So far, the national authorities have no instruments at hand with which they can identify products of new genetic engineering that are already on the market today and are registered in the corresponding EU database.

"With our letter, we call on the responsible research commissioner to adapt her research priorities in the field of genetic engineering to the requirements of the precautionary principle. It is simply inadequate for the Commission to spend 271 million euros on research on new genetic engineering in the field of plants over a period of four years, while exclusively funding projects that advance the methods themselves and their application.

"At the same time, the Commission is making it clear that it would like to significantly relax the genetic engineering laws for the new methods. In view of the lack of risk and proof research, this would mean negligently turning a blind eye. We therefore urge the EU Commission to finally also put out to tender research programmes on risks and detection methods."

Letter from the MEPs to the Commission:
https://www.martin-haeusling.eu/images/220208_Letter_Haeusling_to_COM_Mariya_Gabriel_about_new_GM_research_final.pdf

Background document:
https://t.co/Z8fPul09sn

Source: Martin Häusling MEP
https://martin-haeusling.eu/presse-medien/pressemitteilungen/2814-neue-gentechnik-mehr-forschung-in-risiken-und-nachweisverfahren-investieren.html

Translation by Deepl; editing by GMWatch

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design