GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

New scientific publication highlights novel risks and applications of gene editing

Details
Published: 27 October 2021
Twitter

Need for a case-specific risk assessment of plants obtained from new genetic engineering

A new study published in the scientific journal Plants presents the specific risks of new genetic engineering techniques and gives an overview of possible gene editing applications, Testbiotech reports. The study shows that inducing supposedly small alterations in the genome of crop plants can nevertheless generate complex changes. The results of the study highlight the need for plants developed using New Genetic Engineering techniques to undergo case-specific risk assessment, taking both the properties of the end product and risks posed by the applied procedures into account.

The study was published in a special issue of Plants, "Potential Unintended Effects of Genetic Technologies in Plants". The study focuses on so-called SDN-1 gene editing applications, such as CRISPR/Cas, which can be used to induce small changes in the genome of target organisms. These small changes can be applied multiple times and in combination, and thus lead to significant changes in the metabolism and ingredients of plants.

The study concludes that in slightly more than half of the examined studies on crop plants, individual genes are knocked out by small changes. Among them is the "CRISPR tomato", which has already been approved in Japan and has an increased content of an antihypertensive ingredient (GABA). This case highlights the fact that conventional breeding was not able to change the relevant genes in the way that was possible using gene scissors.

SDN-1 applications are also used to simultaneously modify several genes (multiplexing) or several gene variants at the same time. In camelina, for example, 18 gene copies of the target genes were knocked out simultaneously in order to produce plants with a higher oleic acid content. Such interventions would have been practically impossible to achieve with conventional methods. They can, however, lead to new biological properties in the respective plants.

In addition to the intended genetic changes that SDN-1 applications can achieve, the publication also presents specific and partly novel risks associated with gene scissors and caused by unintended effects. On the one hand, these so-called off-target effects can result from the fact that the gene editing "scissors" cut at unintended regions of the genome, and thus induce changes at these sites. On the other hand, the gene scissors can also cause unintended changes at the target sequence (also called on-target effects). Many of these unintended effects are triggered by the multi-step procedures used during the application of new genetic engineering techniques. Therefore, risk assessment must examine in detail the unintended changes both in the genome and in the metabolism of the respective plants.

The publication is of particular relevance in the context of current discussion on the future regulation of new genetic engineering methods. At the end of September, the EU Commission presented a document proposing far-reaching deregulation of, amongst other things, SDN-1 applications in plants if they can also be produced conventionally. In doing so, however, it is largely disregarding current scientific findings on the risks of the new methods.

Further information

The new publication:
Kawall K (2021). The Generic Risks and the Potential of SDN-1 Applications in Crop Plants. Plants 10(11). 10.3390/plants10112259
https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/11/2259/htm

Background information on the risks of CRISPR/Cas applications by the "Project Genetic Engineering and the Environment":
https://fachstelle-gentechnik-umwelt.de/en/background-informations/


Source of comment: Testbiotech
https://www.testbiotech.org/en/news/new-scientific-publication-novel-risks-and-applications-gene-scissors

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design