GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

LATEST VIDEOS

  • Herbicide-tolerant/Bt cotton chaos in Indian fields
  • Seed keepers and truth tellers: From the frontlines of GM agriculture
  • Myths and Truths of Gene-Edited Foods

KEVIN FOLTA: A rogue’s gallery

Roundup, dollars and Kevin Folta

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

73% of Welsh voters do not support any weakening of GM regulations

Details
Published: 24 March 2021
Twitter

Survey results show Westminster government has no public mandate to deregulate gene editing 

Some 73% of Welsh voters do not support any weakening of GM regulations, according to a survey released by Unchecked UK.

The survey included the following question: “Now that the UK has left the European Union, some organisations are calling on the UK government to remove or alter laws that were originally required by the EU. In your opinion, what should happen to each of the following types of regulation?"

One of the types of regulation listed was "Rules which restrict the genetic engineering of food".

The results showed that a total of 73% of respondents wanted to keep the rules the same (31%) or strengthen them (42%). Only 9% wanted to remove or weaken them, with 19% opting for "don't know".

The survey found that in general, "The majority of Welsh voters identify most closely with statements which portray regulations in a positive light, rather than those which convey the views often expressed by pro-deregulation advocates."

The study was conducted by YouGov (commissioned by Unchecked) and represents the views of 1090 people aged 16+.
 
The survey results send a strong message to the Westminster government that its plan to exempt gene editing from the GMO regulations is not supported by a majority of the public in Wales.

It also shows that DEFRA's biased promotional material about the supposed benefits of gene editing failed to impress Welsh citizens.

Opposition to GM foods is not confined to Wales. Surveys show that consumers across the rest of the UK do not want to grow, buy or eat genetically engineered foods. For example, a 2020 survey by Food Standards Scotland found that, next to chlorinated chicken, genetically engineered foods are a top issue of concern for 57% of consumers. A 2020 study of British social attitudes by NatCen Social Research, which focused on Brexit-related issues, found that 59% wish to maintain the ban on genetically engineered crops. And a 2021 UK-based survey by NatCen Social Research found that 64% of those who took part were opposed to the cultivation of genetically engineered foods.

The recent DEFRA consultation is on plans for deregulation in England only, but Internal Market rules would likely make it very difficult for Wales to prevent unregulated English GMOs from circulating freely in Wales.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design