GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

LATEST VIDEOS

  • Herbicide-tolerant/Bt cotton chaos in Indian fields
  • Seed keepers and truth tellers: From the frontlines of GM agriculture
  • Myths and Truths of Gene-Edited Foods

KEVIN FOLTA: A rogue’s gallery

Roundup, dollars and Kevin Folta

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Non-GMO agroecological banana not the product of nuke program

Details
Published: 13 March 2020
Twitter

Bunch of bananas

Misleading claim debunked

Earlier this month we published a story reporting that in spite of decades of pro-GMO hype telling us that only GM will save the banana from going extinct due to attack from Black Sigatoka disease, it is non-GMO breeding that has succeeded in producing a variety that is resistant to the fungus.

The new variety of banana, named the Pointe d'Or, can be produced using organic and agroecological production methods and is set to become commercially available in France.

However, a commentator responded by claiming on Twitter that the Pointe d'Or banana was produced using random mutagenesis involving radiation. Radiation-induced random mutagenesis is an early GMO technique, albeit one that is exempted from the EU's GMO regulations due to its supposed history of safe use.

In fact the health effects of eating foods produced with this technique have not been tested. But from the point of view of the plant it has always been problematic, producing large numbers of infertile and deformed plants (see GMO Myths and Truths, Chapter 4, for references) in the process of attempting to find one that grows well and has a useful trait.

To back up his claim that the Pointe d'Or is a product of radiation-induced mutagenesis, the Twitter commentator linked to a web page of the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation) describing a banana development program led by the Joint FAO/IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. The program focuses on "irradiating thousands of plantlets with doses of gamma rays or X-rays that cause random mutations" and then screening for one that might be useful in conferring resistance to Black Sigatoka.

We should point out here that the raison d'être of the IAEA is promoting the use of nuclear energy. So we should not be surprised that this agency believes or hopes that the solution to Black Sigatoka is nuking bananas.

The Twitter commentator offered no evidence that the banana developed by CIRAD featured in our article above was the same banana as the one developed in the FAO/IAEA's nuking program. But we thought we should check it out. So we wrote to CIRAD asking them if their banana had been produced using radiation-induced random mutagenesis.

The answer is no, according to their media relations officer Sophie Della Mussia. She explained in an email that the Pointe d'Or banana resulted from "a cross between two ancestral varieties made by hand pollination".

Question about the Pointe dOr banana message


We have no idea why the Twitter commentator attempted to mislead the public by asserting, on the basis of zero evidence, that a naturally bred non-GMO success was in fact the product of radiation-induced random mutagenesis. Surely he couldn't be trying to convince us that this is the only alternative to GM, or to hide the fact that conventional (non-GM) plant breeding is way more successful than GM but without all the ridiculous hype?

Looking at the bigger picture, this episode teaches us that now more than ever, full transparency is needed about which plant breeding techniques were used to develop any given variety. In the cases of certain older varieties, the methods used are shrouded in mystery, but those used in recent years and from now onwards will be discoverable and should be made publicly available in an international database. This will enable organic and agroecological growers to avoid plants and seeds produced in ways that don't meet their standards. It will also ensure that in the case of genetically modified organisms, including gene-edited plants, appropriate regulation can be triggered, depending on the processes used to generate the organism. And finally, it will help us come to a fair judgement about the relative merits of different plant production techniques.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design