GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2022 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

LATEST VIDEOS

  • Herbicide-tolerant/Bt cotton chaos in Indian fields
  • Seed keepers and truth tellers: From the frontlines of GM agriculture
  • Myths and Truths of Gene-Edited Foods

KEVIN FOLTA: A rogue’s gallery

Roundup, dollars and Kevin Folta

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Victory against Monsanto – Federal judge rules in favour of GMO ban

Details
Published: 30 May 2015
Twitter

A judge has found the Jackson County Oregon GMO ban is not pre-empted by the state’s “right to farm” law, thereby allowing the ordinance to become effective on June 5

EXCERPT: Under the ordinance, farmers who already have genetically engineered crops can harvest this year but must remove the crops within 12 months.
—

Victory against Monsanto – Federal judge rules in favour of GMO ban

By Jennifer Baker
Revolution News, 29 May 2015
http://revolution-news.com/victory-against-monsanto-federal-judge-rules-in-favor-of-gmo-ban/
[Excerpts only]

US Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke has found the Jackson County Oregon GMO ban is not pre-empted by the state’s “right to farm” law, thereby allowing the ordinance to become effective on June 5

The Center for Food Safety, a nonprofit critical of biotech crops, considers the ruling a “big win” but expects the plaintiffs will challenge it before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said George Kimbrell, senior attorney for the group.

The judge has recognized that genetically engineered crops pose a significant commercial threat to non-biotech growers, which was a key issue in the litigation, Kimbrell said. “This case is a resounding affirmation of the right of farmers to protect themselves from Genetically Engineered contamination.”

The lawsuit brought by two local farmers backed by Monsanto opposed the anti-GMO ordinance and cited the Oregon Right to Farm Act that protects farmers from neighbors who might complain about noise, smells, dust and other farming practices. Judge Clarke said, “While farming practices may not be limited by a suburbanite’s sensitivities, they may be limited if they cause damage to another farm’s crops.”

Under the ordinance, farmers who already have genetically engineered crops can harvest this year but must remove the crops within 12 months.

While Clarke has dismissed the farmers’ arguments regarding “right to farm”, their claim seeking $4.2 million in compensation from Jackson County remains alive in the case.

The growers argue that forcing them to remove about 300 acres of herbicide-resistant “Roundup Ready” alfalfa amounts to the county condemning their property for public use, which requires just compensation….

Case History

On May 20, 2014, 66% of Jackson County voters cast their votes to ban the growing of genetically engineered crops in Jackson County. Backed by more than 150 family farms, six local granges and hundreds of local businesses, the bi-partisan campaign to protect family farmers from contamination by genetically engineered crops was approved by voters in every part of the county. The victory came despite almost $ 1 million in spending by Monsanto and other chemical corporations that have engineered GMOs to withstand heavy herbicide spraying or produce their own insecticides.

The Effect of Senate Bill 863: After the Jackson County Ordinance was proposed, the Monsanto front group, Oregonians for Food and Shelter, and other GMO-backers went to work in the Oregon Legislature attempting to prevent counties from voting to protect farmers growing traditional crops from banning GMOs. The Legislature ultimately passed SB 863 to try to pre-empt other counties from banning GMOs. But at the insistence of Sen. Bates and Rep. Buckley, a specific exemption for Jackson County was added into the law.

Our Family Farms Coalition (“OFFC”), Center for Food Safety and farmers Chris Hardy and Elise Higley (Oshala Farm) were allowed to join the case as “Defendant-Intervenors” to help defend the Ordinance. Both the family farmers and Jackson County argued that the Right to Farm Act does not prohibit the Ordinance since it was adopted to protect traditional crops from being damaged by GMOs.

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2023 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design