US Right to Know’s Gary Ruskin replies to an article in the Guardian criticizing his organisation for sending Freedom of Information Act requests to uncover potential connections between taxpayer-paid professors and the GM food industry’s PR machine
EXCERPT: The Cornell Alliance for Science has been attacking US Right to Know and organizing a petition against our FOIA requests regarding the agrochemical industry PR and political campaigns to defend GMOs. The Cornell Alliance for Science began last year with a “$5.6 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation”, the world’s largest foundation, which is a promoter of, and investor in, the agri-chemical industry.
—
Who’s behind the attacks on US Right to Know?
Gary Ruskin
US Right to Know, March 13, 2015
http://usrtk.org/gmo/whos-behind-the-attacks-on-u-s-right-to-know/
[links to sources are at the URL above]
There have been a couple of recent attacks on U.S. Right to Know, so I thought it might be useful to sketch out who is behind them.
A March 9 article in the Guardian criticized us for sending Freedom of Information Act requests to uncover the connections between taxpayer-paid professors and the genetically engineered food industry’s PR machine. All three of the article’s authors are former presidents of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. But the article failed to disclose their financial ties.
The first author, Nina Federoff is identified as “an Evan Pugh Professor at Penn State University” but omits that she works at OFW Law, which is a powerhouse food and agribusiness lobbying firm. OFW Law is registered as lobbying for the Council for Biotechnology Information and Syngenta.
We requested correspondence from both Syngenta and CBI — whose members include “BASF, Bayer CropScience, Dow AgroSciences, DuPont, Monsanto Company, and Syngenta” — so we can understand why Ms. Federoff might wish to defend them without disclosing who her firm’s clients are.
The second author, Peter Raven, is identified as Director Emeritus of the Missouri Botanical Garden, which is so intertwined with Monsanto that it even has a Monsanto Center and a Monsanto Hall. The Peter H. Raven Library is on the Fourth Floor of the Monsanto Center. A 2012 news release states that, “Monsanto Company and Monsanto Fund have been among the most generous benefactors of the Missouri Botanical Garden over the past 40-plus years, contributing about $10 million for numerous key capital, science and education projects during that period.”
The third author, Phillip Sharp, works at the David H. Koch Institute at MIT — yes, the same David Koch of the Koch Brothers. In their article, the authors liken us to climate change deniers. For someone connected to the Koch Institute to link us with climate change deniers is beyond ironic. Dr. Sharp also has close ties to the biotech industry, as co-founder of the company Biogen.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science is acting like the American Association for the Advancement of Monsanto. That, truly, is a loss for science, and for us all.
Also, the Cornell Alliance for Science has been attacking U.S. Right to Know and organizing a petition against our FOIA requests regarding the agri-chemical industry PR and political campaigns to defend GMOs.
The Cornell Alliance for Science began last year with a “$5.6 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation”, the world’s largest foundation, which is a promoter of, and investor in, the agri-chemical industry. The CEO of the Gates Foundation, Sue Desmond-Hellman, worked for fourteen years at the biotech company Genentech.
The Cornell Alliance for Science says that their “goal” is to “depolarize the GMO debate”, but attacking our consumer group is an odd way to “depolarize” the debate over the health and environmental effects of genetically engineered food and crops.