So much for "Sense" About Science
So much for 'Sense' About Science
The Guardian, 5 January 2010
*Perfectly sensible celebrity observations about science are being mocked by a group that's no innocent fact-checking service
Every few months, an organisation called Sense About Science (SAS) issues a pamphlet that makes fun of celebrities getting their science wrong. It is full of what it regards to be false assertions by celebrities about the benefits of homeopathy and so on, and ends with an offer by the organisation to act as a fact-checking service.
Newspapers always lap it up. The problem is that they have fallen into a trap again. While they quote Sense About Science with the kind of deference usually reserved for the Royal Society, the organisation is at best suspect.
Sense About Science is much more than an innocent fact-checking service. It is a spin-off of a bizarre political network that began life as the ultra-left Revolutionary Communist Party and switched over to extreme corporate libertarianism when it launched Living Marxism magazine in the late eighties. LM, as it was latterly known, campaigned against, among other things, banning child pornography.
During the 90s, Living Marxism campaigned aggressively in favour of GM food. In 2000, it was sued for falsely claiming that ITN journalists had falsified evidence of Serb atrocities against Bosnian Muslims, and was forced to close. It soon reinvented itself as the Institute of ideas, and the online magazine Spiked.
The chairman of this movement's latest incarnation, Sense About Science, is the Liberal Democrat peer, Lord Taverne. While he routinely fires off about non-scientists debating scientific issues, calling at one point for Prince Charles to be forced to relinquish the throne if he made any further statements critical of GM food, he doesn't have a background in science himself.
Sense About Science's director UK, Ellen Raphael, said "a little checking goes a long way". This is the same organisation that claimed, in response to concerns raised by various celebrities: that if cancer is increasing, "it's more common mostly because people are living longer". This is hard to substantiate for all kinds of reasons, not least the fact that according to the US National Cancer Institute, childhood cancers have been increasing by 1% every year since the 50s.
Not everything the new pamphlet says is nonsense. It can't be, or the newspapers would be embarrassed to run with it. Some examples of celebrities getting it wrong are spot on. They provide readers with the odd laugh, and more importantly, they give credence to the SAS critique of other, perfectly sensible celebrity observations.
Gwyneth Paltrow for instance is ridiculed for saying: "When I read about what pesticides can do to small animals, I thought, 'Why would I want to expose my child to that?'" It's a comment that resonates with many people. SAS, however, counters that "if studies produce doubt about the safety of a pesticide, it is not approved for use".
Perhaps SAS is unaware of the story of Atrazine, a pesticide that causes male frogs to grow ovaries in their testes living in water containing levels 30 times lower than those set by the US Environmental Protection Agency for drinking water. Like countless other dangerous chemicals, it slipped through the safety net and was only banned in 2004 by the EU after years of campaigning by environmentalists.
A little fact-checking, indeed.