GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Donations
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE EDITING MYTHS AND REALITY

A guide through the smokescreen

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

ON-TARGET EFFECTS OF GENE EDITING

Damaged DNA

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

News Archive

  • 2022 articles
  • 2021 articles
  • 2020 articles
  • 2019 articles
  • 2018 articles
  • 2017 articles
  • 2016 articles
  • 2015 articles
  • 2014 articles
  • 2013 articles
  • 2012 articles
  • 2011 articles
  • 2010 articles
  • 2009 articles
  • 2008 articles
  • 2007 articles
  • 2006 articles
  • 2005 articles
  • 2004 articles
  • 2003 articles
  • 2002 articles
  • 2001 articles
  • 2000 articles

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Replies to Monbiot from Usual Suspects

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 10 December 2003
Twitter

Here are replies to George Monbiot's article. Funnily enough, they all come from people or institutions that are in our new Biotech Brigade directory:
www.gmwatch.org

First, there's Peter Marsh of the Social Issues Research Centre which as the British Medical Journal has noted is not what it seems: 'on closer inspection it transpires that this research organisation shares the same offices, directors and leading personnel as a commercial market research company called MCM Research.' It's one that takes money from the pharmaceutical industry, the drinks industry and the food industry, but apart from that it's completely independent.
http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=123

There's Fiona Fox
http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=45
of the Science Media Centre
http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=121
Fiona suggests journalists, including those at The Guardian, would have noticed if she'd been using the SMC to forward an industry-friendly agenda. Well, Fiona, they did. Within months of its launch the SMC was embroiled in controversy, standing accused of operating 'a sort of Mandelsonian rapid rebuttal unit', and of employing 'some of the clumsiest spin techniques of New Labour'.
http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=121

Then there's the Royal Society which says it's not chairing or hosting a Sense About Science Working Party. It's an interesting denial because the SAS Working Party is known to have met at the RS, is chaired by a leading Fellow of the RS - in fact, its former Vice-President. Then, there's the Society's Biological Secretary, Patrick Bateson, who has been assigned to liaise with the Working Party, as has Bob Ward, a Senior Manager for Press and Public Relations at the Royal Society. Several members of the Working Party are also leading Fellows of the Royal Society, including the notorious Sir Peter Lachmann FRS. But apart from that, there's no connection.
http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=151

Finally there's Joe Perry from Rothamsted Research
http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=188
Joe says we can all have dodgy pasts butr so what. By way of example Joe quotes Patrick Moore who says a load of communists took over the environmental movement after the Berlin Wall came down. Joe forgets to mention - or perhaps who ever fed him this, forgot to tell him - about Patrick Moore's long history of attacking the environmental movement as a paid front man for the Canadian logging industry.
http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=89
---
The real expert at exploiting the media

Wednesday December 10, 2003
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,3604,1103605,00.html

George Monbiot claims that Sense About Science, the Institute of Ideas and other organisations that happen not to share his personal agenda constitute a "bizarre and cultish network", which seeks to "dominate scientific and environmental broadcasting" (Invasion of the entryists, December 9).

This seemingly conspiratorial cabal must have been reading Monbiot's pamphlet, An Activists' Guide to Exploiting the Media. To get journalists hooked, he suggests, "create an atmosphere of secrecy, excitement and intrigue... All journalists love to imagine they're in the Famous Five."

Columnists too, it seems.


Dr Peter Marsh
Social Issues Research Centre
...
George Monbiot assumes that scientists are so "politically naive" that they have failed to notice that I have "used the Science Media Centre to promote the views of industry and to launch fierce attacks against those who question them". I suspect this would have been spotted by the vast array of national media journalists who use the centre on a regular basis - not least the Guardian's excellent science and health team.

Fiona Fox                                             Science Media Centre

...
Contrary to George Monbiot's claims, the Royal Society is not chairing or hosting the working party on peer review set up by Sense About Science. The Royal Society has established its own independent working group to investigate best practice in communicating the results of new scientific research to the public, including the role of peer review. It was established by the Royal Society science in society committee, of which Monbiot was formerly a member. If there really are the sort of shenanigans going on within the scientific community that he alleges, Monbiot appears to be part of them.
                                             Stephen Cox
The Royal Society

...
George Monbiot's article recalled another in which Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, pointed to the Trotskyists and anti-capitalists who ditched socialism for the environmentalist bandwagon when the iron curtain fell, and became influential within Greenpeace and similar pressure groups. Many of us do things when we are young that we regret later. But then we grow up and become professors - like you, George.

Prof Joe Perry                                             Harpenden, Herts

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

Non-GM Successes

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2022 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design