GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Latest News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Links
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
      • 2021 articles
      • 2020 articles
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Links
  • Donations
  • 2021
  • 2021a
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMWatch Facebook cornfield banner

SCIENCE SUPPORTS REGULATION OF GENE EDITING

Plant tissue cultures

GENE EDITING: UNEXPECTED OUTCOMES AND RISKS

Damaged DNA on fire

GENE-EDITED CROPS & FOODS

Help stop the new threat

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2003 articles

GM inquiry exposed as top scientist quits

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 22 July 2003
Created: 22 July 2003
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter
"The general feeling - including some of those people who are pro-GM - is that the review is clearly designed to archive something other than an objective assessment of the issues." - Professor Carlo Leifert of Newcastle University (item 2)

"Carlo complained about biotech companies being on the science panel because of the risk they would intimidate the others. They have dominated the panel." (item 1)

Download the GM science review first report (pdf)
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2003/07/21/gmsci-re
port1-full.pdf
                  
---
GM inquiry exposed as top scientist quits
by SEAN POULTER
Daily Mail, 22 July 2003
http://www.femail.co.uk/pages/standard/article.html?in_article_id=189293&in_page_id=169
 
A key member of the Government's GM Science Review has dramatically quit. Dr Carlo Leifert, professor of ecological agriculture at the University of Newcastle, resigned amid claims that the panel was hijacked by biotech supporters.

It is dominated by scientists either employed by biotech giants such as Monsanto and Syngenta or dependent on them for goodwill or funds.

An insider said Dr Leifert was frustrated by the pro-GM bias and quit after an executive of a biotech giant was asked to draw up the panel's conclusions.
                  
An insider said Dr Leifert was frustrated by the pro-GM bias and quit after an executive of a biotech giant was asked to draw up the panel's conclusions.

Dr Andrew Cockburn, a director of Monsanto, was asked to write the first draft of the report.  The GM Science Review was set up by Tony Blair to tell the British public whether or not biotech crops and food were safe.

It is chaired by Mr Blair's scientific adviser, Professor David King. But there are concerns that its conclusions, to be published today, cannot be trusted.

The insider said: "The panel refused to critically evaluate what the problems with GM might be. Whenever issues arose, they were brushed aside. The pro-GM people would get up and say those who make these criticisms are not proper scientists.

"Carlo was put under an awful lot of pressure for pointing out gaps in the GM food and crop safety approvals process  -  for example, failure to check for certain types of allergens.

"Whenever the information being examined appeared critical of GM, it was just rubbished. When the man from Monsanto was chosen to write the first science panel draft, that was too much for Carlo."

Dr Leifert, head of the Tesco Centre for Agriculture, has refused to discuss his resignation.

But the insider said: "The panel had made up its mind before it sat down. They were trying to find reasons to say to the public, 'You don't need to be worried about GM'. When Carlo realised that, he decided it was impossible to put his name to its report."

The revelations are highly embarrassing for the Government. The source said the problem was that the scientists who understand GM are too close to the biotech companies who fund research.

"Too many molecular biologists depend directly on biotech companies for their funding or goodwill. Consequently, it is very difficult for those scientists who really understand the issues to be critical.

"Carlo complained about biotech companies being on the science panel because of the risk they would intimidate the others. They have dominated the panel."

As well as Dr Cockburn, the panel included Dr Simon Bright, head of European genomics at Syngenta. Other GM enthusiasts included Professor Chris Leaver, head of plant sciences at Oxford University, Dr Mike Gale and Professor Philip Dale, both of the John Innes Research Centre in Norwich, and Professor Mike Gasson, of the Institute of Food Research in Norwich.
---
Excerpt from Fury over spin on GM crops
Protesters claim review is meaningless
The Observer, March 9, 2003
http://www.guardian.co.uk/gmdebate/Story/0,2763,910628,00.html

Concern also continues to escalate over the Government's GM science review. Its panel of experts have met only twice since last October, amid accusations it has sidestepped topics such as potential health effects.

...Of the 25 experts involved in the process, at least a third are known to have strong pro-GM views. These include consultants to Lord Sainsbury's biotech investment company Diatech Ltd, employees of Monsanto and Syngenta, and  those who have attacked organic food - the nemesis of the GM lobby - as poisonous.

Professor Carlo Leifert of Newcastle University said: 'The general feeling - including some of those people who are pro-GM - is that the review is clearly designed to archive something other than an objective assessment of the issues.'
  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2021 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design