GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Latest News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • Daily Digest
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
    • Articles
      • GM Myth Makers
      • GM Reports
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
    • Videos
      • Latest Videos
      • Must see videos
      • Cornell videos
      • Agriculture videos
      • Labeling videos
      • Animals videos
      • Corporations videos
      • Corporate takeover videos
      • Contamination videos
      • Latin America videos
      • India videos
      • Asia videos
      • Food safety videos
      • Songs videos
      • Protests videos
      • Biofuel myths videos
      • Index of GM crops and foods
      • Index of speakers
      • Health Effects
    • Contact
    • About
    • Links
    • Donations
    • How donations will help us
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • Archive
      • 2019 articles
      • 2018 articles
      • 2017 articles
      • 2016 articles
      • 2015 articles
      • 2014 articles
      • 2013 articles
      • 2012 articles
      • 2011 articles
      • 2010 articles
      • 2009 articles
      • 2008 articles
      • 2007 articles
      • 2006 articles
      • 2005 articles
      • 2004 articles
      • 2003 articles
      • 2002 articles
      • 2001 articles
      • 2000 articles
    • Daily Digest
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
  • Articles
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Reports
    • How donations will help us
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • Non-GM successes
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
  • Videos
    • Index of speakers
    • Glyphosate Videos
    • Latest Videos
    • Must see videos
    • Health Effects
    • Cornell videos
    • Agriculture videos
    • Labeling videos
    • Animals videos
    • Corporations videos
    • Corporate takeover videos
    • Contamination videos
    • Latin America videos
    • India videos
    • Asia videos
    • Food safety videos
    • Songs videos
    • Protests videos
    • Biofuel myths videos
    • Index of GM crops and foods
  • Contact
  • About
  • Links
  • Donations
SUBSCRIBE TO REVIEWS

GMO INFO

10 Questions About GM Foods
Do GMOs increase yields and reduce pesticide use, and are they needed to feed the world? Find out in the 16-page document, 10 Questions About GM Foods.

News Menu

  • Latest News
  • News Reviews
  • Archive
  • Languages

Please support GMWatch

Donations

You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card.

Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

2012 articles

Seed wars: The right to refuse

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Published: 24 April 2012
Created: 24 April 2012
Last Updated: 22 October 2012
Twitter
Seed wars: The right to refuse
Suman Sahai
The Asian Age, April 24 2012
http://www.asianage.com/columnists/seed-wars-right-refuse-620

The minister of environment and forests, Jayanthi Natarajan, informed the Rajya Sabha during the Budget session of Parliament that the ministry of agriculture and the government's regulatory body, called the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM), have been telling the apex regulatory body for GM organisms, the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC), to do away with the requirement for state government clearance before trials on GM crops can be conducted in a particular state. This is blatant indeed. Government agencies are telling the top regulatory body to dilute its rules to benefit the seed industry. The seed industry is naturally lobbying for this dilution because the more lax the rules and regulations, the better off they are. But why is the agriculture ministry and the RCGM lobbying for the seed industry's benefit?

Almost all the crops in the pipeline, the 300-odd Bt cotton hybrids and the infamous Bt brinjal and everything following these (Bt rice, Bt okra, Bt tomato”¦ and so on) are products being developed by Mahyco-Monsanto. There is not a single public sector GM variety or hybrid to be seen anywhere. The shameful fudging by government scientists on the allegedly public sector Bt cotton the Bt Bikaneri Narma is known to all. So why are the eager beavers in the agriculture ministry and the RCGM falling over themselves to make the seed industry happy”¦ the farmers be damned? Should one smell a rat here?

If the RCGM is ignorant of the Indian Constitution, surely the agriculture ministry with its myriad bureaucrats and one of the most knowledgeable ministers in the Cabinet knows better? Agriculture is a state subject; just about everyone who has gone to high school knows that. Nothing pertaining to agriculture can be dictated by the Centre and no action related to this field can be implemented in the states without their express consent. So the audacity and defiance that we are witnessing is breathtaking, especially since both the RCGM and the agriculture ministry are asking for the suspension of the mandatory “no-objection certificate” (NOC) before field trials of GM crops can be conducted in the states.

The hubris of the government lobbyists is to be seen in their discussions with the GEAC where the case was made that state governments did not issue NOCs because they were essentially ignorant of the nature of biotechnology and biosafety, and that these “highly technical issues” were beyond their comprehension. Chief ministers of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Uttarakhand and Karnataka, please note, it is your ignorance that underlies your refusal to allow the release of GM crops in your state, not your considered opinion expressed in the interest of your people. The agriculture ministry’s future plans include educating these state governments till they can be made to fall in line with what the seed industry wants.

As for state government NOCs, let me tell you of an incident where Gene Campaign was involved. This was in Jharkhand, where we detected a clear case of violation of all prescribed biosafety norms for field trials in the areas where the Mahyco-Monsanto Bt rice was being tested. The testing by the company was done in the middle of the farmers’ fields and there was not a single prescribed containment measure in sight, not even a board announcing that a field trial of Bt rice was underway.

Not surprisingly, we found that rice plants in the neighbouring area had been contaminated with the Bt gene.

When members of the Gene Campaign asked for information regarding the trials under the RTI Act, we received, among other documents, a letter from the head of research of the local agriculture university, refusing to monitor the field trials since they had not been informed of the trials and were not involved in its planning and execution. They were asked to come only in the last phase of the crop, to monitor and report on the outcome. Quite rightly, the research staff refused to be a party to whatever manipulations the company had done.

As of now, field trials of GM crops are being conducted only in Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Rajasthan since these state governments have given permission for the trials. The governments of Uttarakhand, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala and Karnataka have refused permission for trials of GM crops. Some states remain in limbo, where trials are being conducted without any real knowledge of the state government but no explicit denial either. This situation needs clarification.

States must retain their jurisdiction over state subjects and be empowered to take the decisions they feel are in the state's interest. If Bihar does not want to allow GM crops, it should be able to do so without someone in Delhi trying to bypass them, or, worse, browbeat them. To protect themselves from future interference of this kind from Central agencies, states must create legal instruments that will explicitly block such motivated attempts to tread on their territory. The chief ministers' meeting on April 16 revealed the tensions between the Centre and the states with states chafing at the high-handedness of the Centre. This matter of GM crops will only exacerbate the trust deficit. The Centre must back off.

The writer, a genetic scientist who has served on the faculty of the Universities of Chicago and Heidelberg, is convenor of the Gene Campaign
  • Prev
  • Next

Menu

Home

News

News Archive

News Reviews

Videos

Articles

GM Myth Makers

GM Reports

GM Myths

GM Quotes

How Donations Will Help Us

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

RSS

Content 1999 - 2019 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design