Print
US investigation over GM rice contamination lets Bayer off the hook
Friends of the Earth Press Release: 8 October 2007

A year long investigation, published by US authorities, has failed to identify how unlicensed GM rice entered the food chain causing the most serious GM food contamination incident to date. Furthermore, the company who owns the GM rice, Bayer CropScience, will not face any legal action by the US Government. Friends of the Earth is calling on the UK Government and the European Commission to demand that the US urgently tightens up its safety procedures to prevent future GM contamination incidents.

The results of the investigation were released as the UK's Food Standards Agency prepares to review how it handled the contamination incident in the UK [1] and as evidence is published showing that the GM rice is being used to brew Budweiser in the US [2].

Friends of the Earth's GM Campaigner, Clare Oxborrow said:
'This is the most serious GM contamination incident to affect our food. But farmers, consumers and the food industry are still in the dark over how illegal GM rice got into our food because of the pathetically lax standards for regulating GM crop trials in the US. It's a scandal that Bayer will get off scot-free when hundreds of rice farmers have suffered severe financial losses and consumers around the world have been exposed to illegal GM ingredients. The Government and European Commission must put pressure on the US to radically improve their procedures, as well as tightening up our own controls to ensure that future GM contamination incidents are prevented.'

The investigation by APHIS [3], published on Friday evening (5 October), was launched in August 2006 after illegal GM rice was found to have contaminated commercial rice supplies. At the time, the variety (LLRICE601, owned by Bayer CropScience) was not approved anywhere in the world, but had been field tested in the US from 1998 to 2001. Contaminated rice was exported around the world and was discovered in all UK supermarkets. In Europe emergency laws were put in place to stop further contaminated rice being imported and to ensure it was removed from the market.

The investigation failed to discover how LLRICE601, and another rice variety (LLRICE604) also found to have caused contaminated, entered the food chain. Key to this failure was the fact that vital records 'had not been maintained and were not available'. This included original maps showing the locations of the GM field trials and records showing that procedures to confine the trials had been followed such as cleaning equipment and the dates of planting. This meant that the investigators had to rely on interviewing individuals to attempt to piece together what happened. Because of this lack of evidence, Bayer, who claimed the contamination was 'an Act of God' [4], will escape any enforcement action. Hundreds of rice farmers, who suffered severe financial losses, will now have to pin their hopes on winning the class action law suits filed against the GM giant, which could take many years to resolve.

The USDA seems reluctant to address its failures and has admitted that future contamination incidents are likely to occur [5]. It has, however, identified some lessons learned and possible areas for tightening up controls of field trials [6]. These include whether records should be kept, increasing separation distances between GM trials and other crops and whether to require permit holders to have testing procedures available to identify unauthorised GM varieties in case of contamination.

Friends of the Earth is calling on the European Commission and UK Government to put pressure on the US to ensure that they urgently improve their controls on experimental field trials of GM crops, including:

- Any country that exports food and feed crops or seeds to the EU must deliver a complete list of GM crops grown for commercial and experimental use in their country
- For each one, the relevant reference material to allow testing must be provided so countries can take steps to prevent unauthorised foods and feeds from coming onto the EU market.
- A review of European controls (supported by the FSA) to ensure that unauthorised GM crops are not placed on the market. This should result in a new, proactive, system of identifying at-risk crops and countries, and routine monitoring at EU ports of entry for unapproved or mislabelled GMOs.
-
Notes:
[1] Friends of the Earth took the Food Standards Agency to judicial review in February over its failure to ensure unauthorised GM rice was removed from the UK market. Although the Judge did not find the FSA had acted unlawfully, he highlighted a number of mistakes it had made and the FSA promised to conduct a review of the incident. The FSA initially planned a closed process for a small number of invited organisations but following pressure from Friends of the Earth, has now committed to making the process more inclusive and transparent.

[2] http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/releases/anheuser-busch-using-experimen

[3] The USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Investigative and Enforcement Services in coordination with USDA's Office of the Inspector General, focused on the unintentional release of trace amounts of regulated genetically modified rice detected in two commercial varieties of long-grain rice.

Press release:
http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=2007/10/0284.xml
Report: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/newsroom/content/2007/10/content/printable/RiceReport10-2007.pdf

[4] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/21/AR2006112101265.html
[5] Briefing Transcript: http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?contentidonly=true&contentid=2007/10/0285.xml

[6] Lessons learned: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/newsroom/content/2007/10/content/printable/LessonsLearned10-2007.pdf