Canada's voluntary labelling made for industry, not consumers
Mandatory labelling only way forward say NGOs
Voluntary Standard Made for Industry, Not Consumers
OTTAWA, Sept. 8 /CNW/ - Non-governmental organizations slammed the results of the latest vote from the Canadian General Standards Board Committee on Voluntary Labelling of Foods Obtained or Not Obtained Through Genetic Modification. Ballot results released today reveal that the government-industry committee has reached a consensus on a voluntary labelling standard for genetically engineered foods.
"Voluntary labelling of GE frankenfood is a sham and is unlikely to lead to one label on one GE product in one of Canada's grocery stores," said Patrick Venditti of Greenpeace. "This is a bogus standard that has been manufactured by industry and government to avoid a proper mandatory labelling regime for GE foods."
As it is voluntary, no labels on GE foods will be required. The standard also allows for products containing 5% GE material to be labelled non-GE. Of the thirty-eight votes in favour of the standard, twenty represent industry, while nine represent various levels of government. All consumer groups involved in the process either voted against or withdrew from the process. Polls have consistently shown that over 90% of Canadians want labels on GE food.
"Enough is enough. Ottawa knows that Canadians want a mandatory labelling policy and it is high time that this government did something about it," said NadÃ¨ge Adam of the Council of Canadians. "Canadians want labels that protect human health and the environment, not industry profits and government bureaucrats."
"None of the GE crops grown in Canada have undergone chronic, long-term testing," said Bradford Duplisea of the Canadian Health Coalition. "The reality is that no one knows if GE foods are safe to eat. People who don't want to eat these untested products should be able to avoid them, but without mandatory labelling they can't." The Royal Society of Canada expert panel agreed that GE foods were not regulated strongly and that the system needed an overhaul.
The voluntary labelling committee is but one in a long list of government manoeuvres aimed at avoiding a mandatory labelling policy. The government organized the defeat of Bill C-287 - a private member's bill to establish mandatory labelling - and promised to hold parliamentary hearings instead. Shortly after starting however, the Health committee suspended hearings.
"Jean Chrétien should do the right thing before leaving office and give Canadians their long awaited mandatory labelling standard," says Lucy Sharratt from the Polaris Institute.
For further information: Patrick Venditti, Greenpeace, (416) 597-8408, ext 3017; Brad Duplisea, Canadian Health Coalition, (819) 770 1626; Melanie Odell for NadÃ¨ge Adam, Council of Canadians, (613) 233-2773, ext. 289; Lucy Sharratt, Polaris Institute, (613) 237-1717
GM DEMOCRACY - NATIONAL FARMERS UNION SPOKESPERSON IN CANADA
"In a real democracy, the government would say in the interests of the citizens that we don't want this. The fact is, GM technology has nothing to offer. It's like a doctor saying, "Here's a pill. It won't make you feel any better, and it might be bad for you." Who wants to swallow that? But Monsanto want it, and we don't have a real democracy."
NEW ZEALAND MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT: 'GM industry falling apart worldwide'
"How many polls, protests and warning signs does it take...? The Government is not listening to science, to its own voters or to our overseas markets. Countries that embraced GM food in the mid-1990s were ignorant and careless. Countries that voluntarily give up their coveted GM-free status now are being deliberately and obstinately foolish."
CANADIAN FARMER ARNOLD TAYLOR ON GM
"The land forgives a lot. But this is a step too far. We play with nature at our peril. And Nature always bats last. She'll have the final say. We think we've got it sorted - but we've really no idea what we are doing."
"They tell us that GM food isn't bad for our health, but the jury may be out on that for years. And why should we believe them anyway? They told us GM would help farming, and it has brought nothing but trouble."