1.GM POLL
2.Frankenstein comes to life
3.Superweeds? Don't know ya!
COMMENT
All 3 items are from the Daily Mail. As with The Mirror on Iraq, tabloids can sometimes be on the side of the angels.
------
1.GM POLL
Have your say: Are you worried about the damage GM food could wreak?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/dmpolls/index.html?in_poll_id=13693&in_page_id=711
Results so far:
1. Yes
81%
2. No
19%
------
2.Frankenstein comes to life
Daily Mail, 26 July 2005
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_article_id=357081&in_page_id=1787
When the Mail launched its campaign against the introduction of GM crops - or Frankenstein foods - to Britain, triggering a huge political debate, we were accused by the Government of scaremongering.
Tony Blair, his eager accomplices in the scientific establishment and the (mainly American) GM conglomerates tried to ride roughshod over the public anxieties the Mail was articulating.
Month by month, year by year, the Mail stuck to its guns, sending reporters around the world to document the dangers posed by GM products and to prove that the claims made by their proponents were specious.
The public responded magnificently, boycotting GM products in their millions.
New Labour, for its part, continued to attack the Mail and launched a massively expensive PR blitz to persuade the foolish public of the error of their ways.
Today, with the nightmare emergence of a superweed in Britain, the Mail - though it gives us little pleasure to say so - stands utterly vindicated.
The Prime Minister has always insisted that any decision on GM crops should be based firmly on the scientific evidence. Just how much does he need?
Yesterday we learnt (via an obscure Government website, naturally) of a new herbicide-resistant weed.
Our countryside is now threatened by a superweed that requires more - not less - herbicide to control. How bitterly ironic.
Earlier trials showed that modified crops would decimate the populations of bees, butterflies, beetles and songbirds.
So the great mystery remains: why does Mr Blair stubbornly champion GM crops?
Is it because (doubtless prompted by Presidents Clinton and Bush) he is cravenly anxious to suck up to the huge US biotech corporations, regardless of the impact on this country?
Is it because the Science Minister Lord Sainsbury - who has invested a fortune in GM - is the driving force behind the policy and, as the donor of GBP13.5million to Labour, a hard man to ignore?
Or is it because Mr Blair's Director of Communications David Hill worked for GM giant Monsanto?
When the Mail coined the phrase Frankenstein foods, we could have been accused of hyperbole. Today, that accusation simply doesn't bear scrutiny.
------
3.Superweeds? Don't know ya!
GM super-weed discovered in UK field [box]
Daily Mail, 26 July 2005
"The concept of a superweed is very interesting. We have all seen The Day of the Triffids and I guess that can cause some alarm but frankly I do not believe it is a problem."
Dr David Evans, Zeneca research director, June 1998
"The whole notion herbicide tolerance will create a superweed is to my mind a rather peculiar concept."
Sir Robert May, chief government scientist, April 1999
"I have no worries about GM technology producing superweeds any more than I have worried about ordinary crop breeding producing superweeds."
Sir Robert May, chief government scientist, April 1999
Superweeds are "very unlikely to invade our countryside or become problematic plants".
Sir David King, govt's chief scientific advisor, July 2003
The emergence of superweeds is a "distant future possibility for the UK".
DEFRA report on GM crops, March 2004
***
"There is research showing that where a weed gets an advantage, such as GM resistance to weedkillers, then it becomes extremely difficult to kill off without using very nasty chemicals."
Michael Meacher, ex-UK environment minister, July 2005