GM Watch
  • Main Menu
    • Home
    • News
      • Newsletter subscription
      • News Reviews
      • News Languages
        • Notícias em Português
        • Nieuws in het Nederlands
        • Nachrichten in Deutsch
      • Archive
    • Resources
      • GM Myth Makers
      • Non-GM successes
      • GM Quotes
      • GM Myths
      • GM Firms
        • Monsanto: a history
        • Monsanto: resources
        • Bayer: a history
        • Bayer: resources
      • GM Booklet
      • GM Book
    • Contact
    • About
    • Donations
News and comment on genetically modified foods and their associated pesticides    
  • News
    • Newsletter subscription
    • News Reviews
    • News Languages
      • Notícias em Português
      • Nieuws in het Nederlands
      • Nachrichten in Deutsch
    • Archive
  • Resources
    • Non-GM Successes
    • GM Myth Makers
    • GM Quotes
    • GM Myths
    • GM Firms
      • Monsanto: a history
      • Monsanto: resources
      • Bayer: a history
      • Bayer: resources
    • GM Booklet
    • GM Book
  • Donations
  • Contact
  • About

INTRODUCTION TO GM

GMO Myths and Facts front page.jpg

GENE EDITING MYTHS, RISKS, & RESOURCES

Gene Editing Myths and Reality

CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO GM

GMO Myths and Truths front cover

PLEASE SUPPORT GMWATCH

Donations

If you like what we do, please help us do more. You can donate via Paypal or credit/debit card. Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. We greatly appreciate that as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support!

Humans can taste pesticides, French wine study shows

Details
Published: 20 February 2018
Twitter

Wine Tasting Glasses

"People can learn to recognize the tastes of pesticides in drinks and possibly foods" – researchers

Humans can identify pesticides by taste, a new experiment has found. The researchers believe that the experiment is the first in which the tastes of 11 pesticides present in wines were detected by taste.

The study, conducted by Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini and the chef Jérôme Douzelet and published in Food & Nutrition Journal, involved 195 blind tests carried out by 36 professionals from the wine and culinary industries. The wines were produced in France and Italy.

The study examined 16 pairs of organic and non-organic wines produced in seven French regions and one Italian region. The same varieties of grapes were grown both organically and conventionally (with agrochemicals) on the same soils in neighbouring vineyards, in the same climate and in the same year.

The resulting wines were tested for over 250 pesticides. Out of the organic wines, only one bottle was found to contain traces of pesticides. In the non-organic wines, in contrast, 4686 ppb of different pesticides were detected in total, with a mean of 293 ± 270 [0-1144] ppb reached by six pesticides – mostly fungicides and glyphosate-based herbicides.

The 195 blinded taste tests were then carried out with 71 different people on different days.

The pesticides alone or in mixtures were also diluted in water at the levels present in the wines. At least one pesticide mixture was identified as such because it was judged to taste different from water in blind tests: this held true in 85% of cases in which answers were offered by the professionals (147), and 58% recognized all of the waters that contained the pesticides.

Among the people who detected the pesticides, 57% were then able to identify the exact wine containing them. Organic wines were preferred 77% of the time.

The professionals were asked to describe the taste of the pesticides that they were able to identify as being present. The taste of glyphosate, a herbicide often used in vineyards, was described as "strong dryness, acid, acrid, limestone". The glyphosate-based formulation Roundup was described as tasting of "putrefied wood, drying, bitterness".

The most common descriptions of the taste of pesticides in general were a "drying" effect and "papilla blockade", with the latter description being used by the researchers to describe an impaired sense of taste.

The researchers state in their paper that their tests show that people can learn to recognize the tastes of pesticides in drinks and possibly foods. They conclude that "there is no scientific reason why this is not feasible", adding that "A larger study could also be envisaged, not only to confirm the presence and distribution of pesticides in foods and beverages, but also to progress from this primary test of feeling to sensory tests on a wider range of pesticides and a larger number of volunteers."

Sources:

Food & Nutrition Journal https://gavinpublishers.com/admin/assets/articles_pdf/1515065578article_pdf1909863773.pdf
GMOSeralini https://www.gmoseralini.org/french-wine-study-shows-humans-can-taste-pesticides/

The new study: Séralini G-E and Douzelet J (2017). The Taste of Pesticides in Wines. Food & Nutrition Journal: FDNJ-161. DOI: 10.29011/2575-7091. 100061. Published 24 December, 2017. https://gavinpublishers.com/admin/assets/articles_pdf/1515065578article_pdf1909863773.pdf

Menu

Home

Subscriptions

News Archive

News Reviews

GM Book

Resources

Non-GM Successes

GM Myth Makers

GM Myths

GM Quotes

GM Booklet

Contacts

Contact Us

About

Facebook

Twitter

Donations

Content 1999 - 2025 GMWatch.
Web Development By SCS Web Design